Publications

Export 11 results:
Sort by: Author Title [ Year  (Desc)]
In Press
Castellano, K. E., & Ho A. D. (In Press).  Contrasting OLS and quantile regression approaches to Student "Growth" Percentiles. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. castellano_and_ho_jebs.pdf
Ho, A. D., & Reardon S. F. (In Press).  Estimating achievement gaps from test scores reported in ordinal "proficiency" categories. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. ho_reardon_jebs_final_revision.pdf
2011
Hoffer, T. B., Hedberg E. C., Brown K. L., Halverson M. L., Reid-Brossard P., Ho A. D., & Furgol K. E. (2011).  Final report on the evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project. Washington, DC: US Department of Education. Website
Ho, A. D. (2011).  Supporting growth interpretations using through-course assessments. Paper commissioned by the Center for K-12 Assessment and Performance Management at ETS. Website
2010
Furgol, K. E., Ho A. D., & Zimmerman D. L. (2010).  Estimating trends from censored assessment data under No Child Left Behind. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 70, 760-776.Website
2009
Ho, A. D., Lewis D. M., & Farris J. L. M. (2009).  The dependence of growth-model results on proficiency cut scores. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 28(4), 15-26.Website
Ho, A. D. (2009).  A nonparametric framework for comparing trends and gaps across tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 34, 201-228.Website
2008
2007
Ho, A. D., & Haertel E. H. (2007).  (Over)-interpreting mappings of state performance standards onto the NAEP scale. Paper commissioned by the Council of Chief State School Officers. ho_haertel_overinterpreting_mappings.pdf
Ho, A. D., & Haertel E. H. (2007).  Apples to apples? The underlying assumptions of state-NAEP comparisons. Paper commissioned by the Council of Chief State School Officers. ho_haertel_apples_to_apples.pdf
Ho, A. D. (2007).  Discrepancies between score trends from NAEP and state tests: A scale-invariant perspective. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 26(4), 11-20.Website