<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Peter A. Hall</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Peter A. Hall</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Introduction</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Social Resilience In The Neoliberal Era</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Forthcoming</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cambridge University Press</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cambridge </style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Welburn, Jessica S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fleming, Crystal M.</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Peter A. Hall</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Responses to Discrimination and Social Resilience Under Neoliberalism: The United States Compared</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Age</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Forthcoming</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cambridge University Press</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cambridge</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mizrachi, Nissim</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Responses to Stigmatization in Comparative Perspective</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Routledge</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">New York, NY</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Peter A. Hall</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Social Resilience In The Neoliberal Era</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cambridge University Press</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cambridge </style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Peter A. Hall</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Why Social Relations Matter for Politics and Successful Societies</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Annual Review of Political Science </style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">16</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1-23</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fleming, Crystal</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jessica Welburn</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">African Americans Respond to Stigmatization: The Meanings and Salience of Confronting, Deflecting Conflict, Educating the Ignorant and ‘Managing The Self’</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ethnic and Racial Studies</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01419870.2011.589528</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">35</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">400-417</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wuermli, Alice</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Silbereisen, Rainer K.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mattias Lundberg</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jere R. Behrman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aber,  Larry</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lundberg, Mattias and</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wuermli, Alice</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A Conceptual Framework</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Children and Youth in Crisis: Protecting and Promoting Human Development in Times of Economic Shocks</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Washington, D.C.</style></pub-location><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">29-101</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Generational Differences in Accounts of the Development of U.S. Cultural Sociology—Let Me Count the Ways: Response to Lizardo’s and Mische’s Comments</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sociological Forum</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">27</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">251-254</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>23</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sun, Anna</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">How China's Elite Universities Will Have to Change</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Chronicle of Higher Education </style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A 29</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">How Has Bourdieu Been Good to Think With? The Case of the United States</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sociological Forum </style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">27</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">228-237</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lizardo, Omar . 2012. &quot;The Three Phases of Bourdieu’s U.S. Reception: Comment on Lamont.&quot; Sociological Forum 27 (1):238-244. &lt;a href=&quot;http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/lamont/files/lizardo_on__lamont.pdf&quot; data-fid=&quot;54286&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mische, Ann . 2012. &quot;Bourdieu in Contention and Deliberation: Response to Lamont and Lizardo&quot;Sociological Forum 27 (1): 245-250.&lt;a href=&quot;http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/lamont/files/mische_on_lamont.pdf&quot; data-fid=&quot;54291&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</style></notes></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>19</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In This Election Season: A Plea for a Cultural Sociology that Matters</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Culture Newsletter: American Sociological Association Section on the Sociology of Culture</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">25</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6, 14-15</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mizrachi, Nissim</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Introduction: Ordinary People Doing Extraordinary Things: Responses to Stigmatization in Comparative Perspective</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ethnic and Racial Studies</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rers20/current</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">35</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">365-381</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Welburn, Jessica S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fleming, Crystal M.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Introduction: Varieties of Responses to Stigmatization: Macro, Meso, and Micro Dimensions</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Du Bois Review</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">43-49</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mizrachi, Nissim</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mizrachi, Nissim</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ordinary People Doing Extraordinary Things: Responses to Stigmatization in Comparative </style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Responses to Stigmatization in Comparative Perspective</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Routledge</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">New York</style></pub-location><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1-17</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>27</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Peter Gourevitch</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Susan Christopherson</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Janet Ecker</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">George Fallis</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lucia Fanning</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jocelyn Maclure</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Imre Szeman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Diane-Gabrielle Tremblay</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dale Turner</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Report of the SSHRC International Expert Panel for Imagining Canada’s Future</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12/12</style></date></pub-dates></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Canadian Institute for Advanced Research</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Toronto </style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Review of &quot;Political Epistemics: The Secret Police, the Opposition, and the End of East German Socialism&quot; by Andreas Glaeser</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">American Journal of Sociology</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">118</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">258-260</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Welburn, Jessica S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fleming, Crystal M.</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Special Feature: Varieties of Responses to Stigmatization: Macro, Meso, and Micro Dimensions</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Du Bois Review</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">41-200</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Annual Review of Sociology </style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">38</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">201-221</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">21</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Huutoniemi, Katri</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Charles Camic</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Neil Gross</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Comparing Customary Rules of Fairness: Evaluative Practices in Various Types of Peer Review Panels</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Social Knowledge in the Making</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Chicago Press</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chicago</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Servais, Paul</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Équité pragmatique: production du sacré en respectant les règles</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">L’évaluation de la recherche en sciences humaines et sociales</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Acedemia-Bruylant</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Louvain-la-Neuve</style></pub-location><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">213-230</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Daniel, Caitlin</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Arzoglou, Eleni</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">David Brady</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">European Workers: Meaning-Making Beings</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Comparing European Workers Part B: Policies and Institutions</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Emerald Group Publishing Limited </style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bingley, UK</style></pub-location><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">287-312</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Huutoniemi, Katri</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Opening the Black Box of Evaluation: How Quality is Recognized by Peer Review Panels</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bulletin SAGW</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">47-49</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michele Lamont</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Charles Camic</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Neil Gross</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Social Knowledge in the Making</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo11753188.html</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Chicago Press</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chicago</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Containing 13 original empirical studies of the day-to-day knowledge-making activities of social scientists and specialists in related areas, this volume represents the first comprehensive effort to bring the “turn to practice” to bear on the understanding of social knowledge. Inspired by advances in the interdisciplinary field of science studies, where over the past quarter century researchers have plumbed the inner workings of the physical and biological sciences using a variety of social and historical lenses, contributors to the volume tackle a range of previously unexplored questions about the situated practices involved in the production, assessment, and use of diverse forms of social knowledge. In so doing, authors address topics including the changing practices of historical research, anthropological data collection, and library usage; the knowledge evaluation practices of peer review panels, institutional review boards, and multi-disciplinary research consortia; and processes of knowledge production and application in private and public arenas beyond the academy, such as global banks, survey research organizations, and policy venues in national security and economic regulation. Assembling a stellar cast of senior and junior researchers from sociology, history, anthropology, and science studies, the editors bring into dialogue scholars at work on these different historical and contemporary subjects and, on this basis, propose a new research agenda for the study of the production and evaluation of social knowledge in the social sciences, the humanities, and a broad range of non-academic settings.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michele Lamont</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mario Small</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cultural Diversity and Anti-Poverty Policy</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">International Social Science Journal</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">61</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">169-80</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">199</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Violaine Roussell</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bleuwenn Lechaux</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Forward. Voicing Dissent: American Artists and the War on Iraq</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Routledge</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">New York</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Steven Hitlin</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stephen Vaisey</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Introduction </style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Handbook of the Sociology of Morality </style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Springer</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">New York</style></pub-location><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">v-vii</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Laurent,  Éloi</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Introduction: Assessing France as a Model of Societal Success</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">French Politics, Culture and Society </style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">28</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">66-73</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michele Lamont</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mario Luis Small</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">David J. Harding</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Introduction: Reconsidering Culture and Poverty</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">629</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6-27</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;To bridge the gap between poverty scholars and culture scholars, the editors have assembled papers around the topic &quot;Reconsidering Culture and Poverty.&quot; Chapters concern cultural orientations concerning upward mobility, finding a job, and sexual behavior, fatherhood, civic participation, and other topics. Contributors include Nathan Fosse, Joshua Guetzkow, Biju Rao, Paromita Sanyal, Sandra Smith, Stephen Vaisey, Maureen Waller, and William Julius Wilson. We hope that this issue will demonstrate the importance of cultural concepts for poverty research, serve as a model and a resource for poverty scholars who wish to incorporate cultural concepts into their research, assist in the training of future scholars working at the nexus of poverty and culture, and identify crucial areas for future methodological, theoretical, and empirical development. Order a copy (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/soc/faculty/lamont/Annals_Brochure_May2010_v629.pdf&quot;&gt;http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/soc/faculty/lamont/Annals_Brochure_May2010_v629.pdf&lt;/a&gt;) from the Annals or read the policy brief (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/soc/faculty/lamont/Reconsidering-Culture-and-Poverty_PolicyBrief.pdf&quot;&gt;http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/soc/faculty/lamont/Reconsidering-Culture-and-Poverty_PolicyBrief.pdf&lt;/a&gt;) from the National Poverty Center. Read the American Sociological Association's coverage in the July/August 2010 edition of Footnotes: &quot;Social Scientists Offer a Multifaceted Picture of Poverty’s Consequences.&quot; Response to Steinberg's Boston Review piece on our issue on Reconsidering Culture and Poverty. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://educationpolicyblog.blogspot.com/2011/01/mario-small-responds.html&quot;&gt;http://educationpolicyblog.blogspot.com/2011/01/mario-small-responds.html&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Brazilian translation. 2011. Socilogica &amp;amp; Anthorpoligia. 1(2): 91-117.&lt;/p&gt;</style></notes></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michele Lamont</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Elizabeth Silva</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alan Warde</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Looking Back at Bourdieu</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cultural Analysis and Bourdieu’s Legacy: Settling Accounts and Developing Alternatives</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Routledge</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">London</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>12</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michele Lamont</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bruno Cousin</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Multiple Crises of French Universities</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Council of National Associations</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">28 Jan. 2010</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://isacna.wordpress.com/2010/01/28/the-multiple-crises-of-french-universities1/</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michele Lamont</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">What Makes a Society Successful?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Perspective on Europe</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">40</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">13-14</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michele Lamont</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Graziella Moraes Da Silva</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Complementary Rather than Contradictory: Diversity and Excellence in Peer Review and Admissions in American Higher Education</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">21st Century Society: Journal of the Academy of Social Science</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1-15</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Diversity is largely accepted as a positive value in American society. Nevertheless, policies to encourage diversity, e.g. affirmative action, language policies and legalising illegal immigrants, are still largely disputed, and often understood as having contradictory and largely negative consequences. The implementation of diversity is still seen as a threat to meritocracy, national cohesion, and democracy. This paper analyses how excellence and diversity are discussed in two academic decision-making processes: admission at two elite public universities and the distribution of competitive research fellowships. We argue that excellence and diversity are not alternative but additive considerations in the allocation of resources. The administrators and academics we studied factor diversity in as an additional consideration when decisions are to be made between applicants of roughly equal standing. &lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Marc Breviglieri</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Claudette Lafaye</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Danny Trom</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Critères d'évaluation et structures culturelles</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Compétences critiques et sens de la justice</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Economica</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Paris</style></pub-location><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">437-446</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michele Lamont</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gregoire Mallard</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Joshua Guetzkow</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fairness as Appropriateness: Negotiating Epistemological Differences in Peer Review</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Science, Technology &amp; Human Values</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">34</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">573-606</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Epistemological differences fuel continuous and frequently divisive debates in the social sciences and the humanities. Sociologists have yet to consider how such differences affect peer evaluation. The empirical literature has studied distributive fairness, consensus, and the norm of universalism, but neglected the content of evaluation and how epistemological differences affect perception of fairness in decision-making. The normative literature suggests that evaluators should overcome their epistemological differences by &quot;translating&quot; their preferred standards into general criteria of evaluation. However, little is known about how procedural fairness actually operates in panels, and more specifically about how agreements are reached in the face of epistemological diversity. Drawing on 81 interviews with panelists serving on five multidisciplinary fellowship competitions in the social sciences and the humanities, we show that: 1) Evaluators generally draw on four epistemological styles to make arguments in favor of and against proposals. These are the constructivist, comprehensive, positivist, and utilitarian styles. 2) Although the comprehensive style is favored, there is considerable diversity in the epistemological styles used in the panels we studied; 3) Peer reviewers define a fair-decision making process as one in which panelists engage in &quot;cognitive contextualization,&quot; that is, use epistemological styles most appropriate to the field or discipline of the proposal under review. These findings challenge the normative literature that associates procedural fairness with the use of generalizable criteria of evaluation. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michele Lamont</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">How Professor Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Harvard University Press</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cambridge, MA</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;How Professors Think: the title alone is enough to make students, academics, or anyone interested in higher education in the U.S. pick it up and peruse its pages. Who wouldn’t want an inside glimpse into the working of some of the finest minds in our nation’s colleges? While Dr. Lamont’s deceptively slim volume (only 250 pages leaving out the appendix, references, and notes) does not quite deliver on the promise of all her title entails, what she has achieved her is more subtle and, ultimately, more interesting. Using the method of “opening the black box” of the peer review process as used in the United States, Dr. Lamont paints a fascinating picture of the mindset of academics in several unique disciplines and how they must interact in an interdisciplinary fashion to achieve the stated goal of “rewarding academic excellence.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Paperback, 2010.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chinese translation. Beijing, China: Higher Education Press. With original Preface. 2011.&lt;br&gt; Spanish translation forthcoming. Valencia, Spain: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Valencia.&lt;br&gt; Korean translation forthcoming. Seoul, South Korea: Korea National Open University.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Reviews&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2010 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/soc/faculty/lamont/Inside%20the%20Sausage%20Factory.pdf&quot;&gt;[[{&quot;type&quot;:&quot;media&quot;,&quot;view_mode&quot;:&quot;os_files_link&quot;,&quot;fid&quot;:&quot;120751&quot;,&quot;attributes&quot;:{&quot;class&quot;:&quot;file-icon media-image&quot;}}]]&lt;/a&gt; to symposium around “How Professors Think”: Inside the Sausage Factory. Sociologica.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;August 4, 2009. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.universityaffairs.ca/peering-behind-the-curtain-of-peer-review.aspx&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&quot;Peering Behind the Curtain of Peer Review&quot;&lt;/a&gt; by Peggy Berkowitz. &lt;em&gt;University Affairs.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2009. &lt;a href=&quot;http://bostonist.com/2009/05/05/michele_lamont_reveals_how_professo.php&quot;&gt;Michele Lamont Reveals How Professors Think—and Why?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;Bostonist,&lt;/em&gt; posted May 5, 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2009. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/03/04/peerreview&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&quot;The 'Black Box' of Peer Review&quot;&lt;/a&gt; by Scott Jaschik. &lt;em&gt;Inside Higher Ed,&lt;/em&gt; posted March 4, 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Articles &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2009. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tcrecord.org/Home.asp&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Is Your Stuff Up to Snuff?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;Teachers College Record&lt;/em&gt;, Date Published: November 24, 2009 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tcrecord.org&quot;&gt;http://www.tcrecord.org&lt;/a&gt; ID Number: 15847, Date Accessed: 11/25/2009 11:55:20 AM.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2009. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mouvements.info/spip.php?article409&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Les conditions de l’évaluation universitaire: Quelques réflexions à partir du cas américain&lt;/a&gt; (with Bruno Cousin). &lt;em&gt;Mouvements,&lt;/em&gt; May 18, 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2009. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michele-lamont/a-fairness-doctrine-for-a_b_200201.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;A Fairness Doctrine For Academia.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;The Huffington Post,&lt;/em&gt; posted May 8, 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2009. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michele-lamont/opening-the-black-box-of_b_192841.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Opening the Black Box of Peer Review.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;The Huffington Post,&lt;/em&gt; posted April 30, 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2009. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michele-lamont/diversity-and-excellence_b_191164.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Diversity and Excellence in Higher Education: not Alternatives but Additives&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;em&gt;The Huffington Post,&lt;/em&gt; posted April 27, 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2009, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/3/26/713300/-Re-examing-the-funding-of-academia-through-Obamas-Recovery-Act&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Re-examing the funding of academia through Obama's Recovery Act&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;em&gt;Daily Kos,&lt;/em&gt; posted March 26, 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interviews&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2010. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/24/arts/24peer.html?_r=1&amp;amp;emc=etal&quot;&gt;Wikipedia Age Challenges Scholars' Sacred Peer Review&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt;, Posted on August 24, 2010.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2009. &lt;a href=&quot;http://chronicle.com/free/v55/i30/30b01301.htm&quot;&gt;Reviewing the Reviewers: A Q&amp;amp;A With Michèle Lamont.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;The Chronicle of Higher Education,&lt;/em&gt; posted April 3, 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2009. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nonfiction.fr/article-2361-michele_lamont__lexpertise_des_chercheurs_doit_etre_au_centre_du_dispositif_devaluation.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Michèle Lamont : &quot;L'expertise des chercheurs doit être au centre du dispositif d'évaluation.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;nonfiction.fr : Le quotidien des livres et des idées,&lt;/em&gt; posted March 30, 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Podcasts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2009. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hup.harvard.edu/audio/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Michèle Lamont is the author of&lt;em&gt; How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/a&gt; Harvard University Press.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2009. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.academicevolution.com/2009/05/podcast-005-interview-with-mich%C3%A8le-lamont.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Interview with Michèle Lamont.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;Academic Evolution&lt;/em&gt; posted May 14, 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2009. &lt;a href=&quot;http://cesblog.fas.harvard.edu/cesPodcasts/?p=205&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;A Conversation about Michele Lamont’s book &lt;em&gt;“How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment.”&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Center for European Studies, Harvard University, posted April 8, 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2009. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_videos.jsp?cntn_id=114497&amp;amp;media_id=64862&amp;amp;org=NSF&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Michèle Lamont discusses her new book, &lt;em&gt;&quot;How Professors Think.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; National Science Foundation, posted March 31, 2009.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Peter A. Hall</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Peter A. Hall</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Introduction</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Successful Societies: How Institutions and Culture Affect Health</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cambridge University Press</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cambridge, UK and New York</style></pub-location><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1-22</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bruno Cousin</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Les conditions de l’évaluation universitaire</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Revue Mouvements</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">60</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">113-117</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Patricia White</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">NSF Report Tackles Standards of Evaluation for Qualitative Research </style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Footnotes</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">36</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lichterman, Paul</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carter, Prudence L.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Brint, Steven</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Schroedel, Jean Reith</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Race-Bridgin for Christ?  Conservative Christians and Black-White Relations in Community Life </style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Evangelicals and Democracy in American </style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Russell Sage Foundation </style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">New York </style></pub-location><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">187-220</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Peter A. Hall</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Responses to Racism Health, and Social Inclusion as a Dimension of Successful Societies</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Successful Societies: How Institutions and Culture Affect Health</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cambridge University Press</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cambridge, UK and New York</style></pub-location><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">151-168</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michele Lamont</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Peter A. Hall</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Successful Societies: How Institutions and Culture Affect Health</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cambridge University Press</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cambridge, UK and New York</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;div class=&quot;field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-full&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field-item even&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why are some types of societies more successful than others at promoting individual and collective well-being? Focusing on population health as an indicator of social success, this book opens up new perspectives on the ways in which social relations condition health and the public policies that address it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interviews&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;October 15, 2009. &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2009/10/book-successful-societies/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&quot;What makes a successful society?&quot;&lt;/a&gt; By Amy Lavoie. &lt;em&gt;Harvard Gazette.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Op Eds&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;February 4, 2010. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&amp;amp;storycode=410230&amp;amp;c=1&quot;&gt;&quot;From where I sit: Dashed hope brings ill wind.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;Times Higher Education.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;November 13, 2009. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/the-wear-and-tear-of-our-daily-lives/article1363167/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&quot;The wear and tear of our daily lives.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; By Peter A. Hall and Michèle Lamont. &lt;em&gt;The Globe and Mail.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Podcasts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;November 30, 2009: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cifar.ca/web/podcasts/lamont.mp3&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;What Makes a Society Succeed?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;October 22, 2009: &lt;a href=&quot;http://hosting.epresence.tv/MUNK/1/watch/142.aspx&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;CIFAR: Successful Societies - How Insitutions and Culture Affect Health&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (Munk Center, University of Toronto).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>27</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michele Lamont</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Patricia White</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Evaluation of Systematic Qualitative Research in the Social Sciences </style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">November 2008</style></date></pub-dates></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">National Science Foundation</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">As an expert on evaluation in the social sciences, Lamont was asked by the National Science Foundation report to convene a panel of anthropologists, political scientists, sociologists and law and society scholars to discuss how to evaluate qualitative social science research. This report describes the standards that are shared across disciplines. It also includes papers written by more than twenty contributors on various dimensions of the evaluation process and on how to produce excellent proposals.</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mario Luis Small</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Harris, David</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lin, Ann</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">How Culture Matters: Enriching Our Understandings of Poverty</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Colors of Poverty: Why Racial and Ethnic Disparities Persist</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Russell Sage Foundation</style></publisher><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">76-102</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>27</ref-type><contributors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Promoting Excellence in Research </style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Council of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mario Small</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cultural Diversity and Poverty Eradication</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">World Report on Cultural Diversity, UNESCO</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2007</style></year></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">European Studies in the United States: Current Challenges and Prospects for the Future</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Tocqueville Review</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2007</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">XXXIX</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">165-174</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mallard, Grégoire</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Joshua Guetzkow</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Beyond Blind Faith: Overcoming the Obstacles to Interdisciplinary Evaluation</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Research Evaluation</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">15</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">43-55</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Reprinted in 2012 in Peer Review, Scientific Integrity, and the Governance of Science, edited by Bob Frodeman, Britt Holbrook, Carl Mitcham. Beijin: Remnin Press&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</style></notes></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michele Lamont</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Christopher Bail</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sur les frontières de la reconnaissance. Les catégories internes et externes de l'identité collective</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Revue Européenne des Migrations Internationalea</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">21</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">61-90</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article offers a framework for analyzing variations in how members of stigmatized ethno-racial groups establish equivalence with dominant groups through the comparative study of “equalization strategies.” Whereas extant scholarship on anti-racism has focused on the struggle of social movements against institutional and political exclusion and for social justice, we are concerned with the “everyday” anti-racist strategies deployed by members of stigmatized groups. We seek to compare how these strategies vary according to the permeability of inter-group boundaries. The first section defines our research problem and the second section locates our agenda within the current literature. The third section sketches an empirical context for the comparative analysis of equalization strategies across four cases: Palestinian citizens of Israel, Catholics in Northern Ireland, blacks in Brazil, and Québecois in Canada. Whereas the first two cases are examples of ethnic conflict where group boundaries are tightly policed, the second cases exemplify more permeable boundaries. We conclude by offering tentative hypotheses about the relationship between the permeability of inter-group boundaries and the salience and range of equalization strategies used by members of stigmatized ethno-racial groups to establish equivalence with their counterparts in dominant majority groups. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fleming, Crystal</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Everyday Anti-Racism: Competence and Religion in the Cultural Repertoire of the African American Elite</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Du Bois Review</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2005</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">29-43</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This exploratory study makes a contribution to the literature on anti-racism by unpacking the cultural categories through which everyday anti-racism is experienced and practiced by extraordinarily successful African-Americans. Using a phenomenological approach, we focus on processes of classification to analyze the criteria that they mobilize to compare racial groups and establish their equality. We first summarize results from earlier work on the anti-racist strategies of White and African-American workers. Second, drawing upon in-depth interviews with members of the Black elite, we show that demonstrating intelligence and competence, and gaining knowledge, are particularly valued strategies of equalization, while religion has a subordinate role within their anti-racist repertoire. Thus, gaining cultural membership is often equated with educational and occupational attainment. Anti-racist strategies that value college education and achieving by the standards of American individualism may exclude many poor and working class African-Americans from cultural membership. Thus strategies of equalization based on educational and professional competence may prove dysfunctional for racial solidarity. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bulmer, Martin &amp; Solomos, John</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A Life of Sad, But Justified, Choices: Interviewing Across (too) Many Divides</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Researching Race and Racism</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2004</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Routledge</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">London</style></pub-location><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">163-171</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michele Lamont</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Angela Tsay</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Andrew Abbott</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Joshua Guetzkow</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">From Character to Intellect: Changing Conceptions of Merit in the Social Sciences and the Humanities, 1951-1971</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Poetics</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2003</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">31</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">23-17</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This paper investigates the questions of whether and how the evaluation of merit in academic disciplines changed between the early 1950s and the late 1960s. We analyze letters of recommendation written for prospective graduate students who applied to the Woodrow Wilson Fellowship Program during the periods 1951–1955 and 1967–1971, in the disciplines of economics, political science, philosophy, English and history. We find that in all disciplines, the relative use of intellectual and technical criteria increased during this time, the relative use of moral and social background criteria declined, while the use of personal criteria did not change. We find little evidence of disciplinary differences. In suggesting potential explanations for these findings, we focus on the impact of the dramatic growth and expanding diversity of academia during the postwar years.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michele Lamont</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Who Counts as 'Them': Racism and Virtue in the United States and France</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Contexts</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2003</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">36-41</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In the United States, black Americans are the typical targets of discrimination. In France, the victims are usually Arab immigrants. In both cases, prejudice against minorities has less to do with the color or national origin of the ostracized than with the need of whites and natives to preserve their own sense of moral self-worth.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michele Lamont</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ann Morning</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Margarita Mooney</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">North African Immigrants Respond to French Racism: Demonstrating Equivalence Through Universalism</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ethnic and Racial Studies</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2002</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">25</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">390-414</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article examines how ordinary victims of racism rebut racist beliefs communicated to them by the mass media and encountered in daily life. We describe the rhetorical devices that North African immigrant men in France use to respond to French racism, drawing on thirty in-depth interviews conducted with randomly selected blue-collar immigrants residing in the Paris suburbs. We argue that while French anti-racist rhetorics, both elite and popular, draw on universalistic principles informed by the Enlightenment as well as French Republican ideals, North African immigrants rebut racism by drawing instead on their daily experience and on a 'particular universalism', i.e. a moral universalism informed by Islam. Their arguments frequently center on claims of equality or similarity between all human beings, or between North Africans and the French. Available cultural repertoires and the structural positions of immigrants help to account for the rhetorical devices that immigrants use to rebut racism. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michele Lamont</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sada Aksartova</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ordinary Cosmopolitanisms: Strategies for Bridging Racial Boundaries among Working Class Men</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Theory, Culture and Society</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2002</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">19</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1-25</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In contrast to most literature on cosmopolitanism, which focuses on its elite forms, this article analyzes how ordinary people bridge racial boundaries in everyday life. It is based on interviews with 150 non-college-educated white and black workers in the United States and white and North African workers in France. The comparison of the four groups shows how differences in cultural repertoires across national context and structural location shape distinct anti-racist rhetorics. Market-based arguments are salient among American workers, while arguments based on solidarity and egalitarianism are used by French, but not by American, workers. Minority workers in both countries employ a more extensive toolkit of anti-racist rhetoric as compared to whites. The interviewed men privilege evidence grounded in everyday experience, and their claims of human equality are articulated in terms of universal human nature and, in the case of blacks and North Africans, universal morality. Workers' conceptual frameworks have little in common with multiculturalism that occupies a central place in the literature on cosmopolitanism. We argue that for the discussion and practice of cosmopolitanism to move forward we should shift our attention to the study of multiple ordinary cosmopolitanisms. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Virág Molnár</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kenneth Green</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Andrew McMeekin</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mark Tomlinson</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vivien Walsh</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Social Categorization and Group Identification: How African Americans Shape their Collective Identity Through Consumption</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Interdisciplinary Approaches to Demand and Its Role in Innovation</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2002</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Manchester University Press</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Manchester</style></pub-location><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">88-111</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michele Lamont</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Virág Molnár</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Study of Boundaries Across the Social Sciences</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Annual Review of Sociology</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2002</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">28</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">167-95</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;In recent years, the concept of boundaries has been at the center of influential research agendas in anthropology, history, political science, social psychology, and sociology. This article surveys some of these developments while describing the value added provided by the concept, particularly concerning the study of relational processes. It discusses literatures on (a) social and collective identity; (b) class, ethnic/racial, and gender/sex inequality; (c) professions, knowledge, and science; and (d) communities, national identities, and spatial boundaries. It points to similar processes at work across a range of institutions and social locations. It also suggests paths for further developments, focusing on the relationship between social and symbolic boundaries, cultural mechanisms for the production of boundaries, difference and hybridity, and cultural membership and group classifications. &lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michele Lamont</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Virág Molnár</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">How Blacks Use Consumption to Shape their Collective Identity: Evidence from African-American Marketing Specialists</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Consumer Culture</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2001</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">31-45</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article develops a 'social identity' perspective to the study of consumption. It builds on Richard Jenkins' distinction between internal and external definitions of collective identity and explores the interplay of these definitions in the realm of consumption. Evidence is collected from interviews with marketing professionals who specialize in the African-American market segment to show that this theoretical approach complements and improves on existing approaches. Marketing professionals' interpretations of the black consumer's distinctiveness are used to map the twin processes of internal and external definitions of collective identity for African-Americans. The interviews suggest that marketing professionals (1) actively shape the meanings of the category of 'the black consumer' for the public at large; (2)promote powerful normative models of collective identity that equate social membership with conspicuous consumption; (3) believe that African-Americans use consumption to defy racism and share collective identities most valued in American society (e.g. middle-class membership); and (4) simultaneously enact a positive vision of their cultural distinctiveness. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reprinted August 2010.</style></notes></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michele Lamont</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Immigration and the Salience of Racial Boundaries among French Workers</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">French Politics, Culture, and Society</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2001</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">19</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1-21</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;In contrast to the view that republicanism helps mitigate against racism, interviews and national surveys suggest that republicanism has had a contradictory impact on white workers in France. On the one hand, by delegitimizng race it has helped them view Antillais is France, as well as black African immigrants, relatively tolerantly. On the other hand, because many workers regard the Republic in cultural terms as a French way of life rooted in Christian values, republicanism has also confirmed white workers in their antipathy toward North Africans, whom they regard as too different in religion and social mores to assimilate into French society. This prejudicial application of republicanism has been more appealing to white workers in the context of chronic unemployment and a political landscape affected by the electoral breakthroughs of the National Front. [Adapted from Introduction, Race in France: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Politics of Difference, edited by Herrick Chapman and Laura L. Frader (New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2004), pp. 10-11.]&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michele Lamont</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jason Kaufman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michael Moody</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Best of the Brightest: Definitions of the Ideal Self among Prize-Winning Students</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sociological Forum</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2000</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">15</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">187-224</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This paper documents and explains characteristics of the ideal self rewarded by the American educational system as defined and projected by high school students who have been selected as Presidential Scholars in a national academic competition sponsored by the Department of Education and a White house Commission. Drawing on analysis of competition essays written by 119 Presidential Scholars and interviews conducted with 19 of them, we identify how these students implicitly and explicitly define the ideal self and what they do to demonstrate that they embody the characteristics of the self they perceive as rewarded by the American educational system. The data show that morality is the most salient dimension of the ideal self displayed by Scholars, and that they define it in terms of self-actualization, authenticity, and interpersonal morality; that Scholars present negative or ambivalent views concerning the importance of socioeconomic status; and that culture as a dimension of the ideal self is highlighted only by a subset of Scholars. In general, their displayed definitions of the ideal self are individualist in content but highly institutionalized in form. We explain our findings by the cultural repertoires that are made available to students and by their life experience and the broader structural characteristics of American society that lead them to draw on specific repertoires. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michele Lamont</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Comparing French and American Sociology</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tocqueville Review</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2000</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">21</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">109-22</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Some preliminary research guidelines for a systematic comparison of French &amp; American sociology are proffered. American sociology is argued to be more structured than French sociology, with career paths more institutionally defined &amp; more consensus on the profits of professional investments &amp; the ranking of departments &amp; journals. Further, in American sociology, a stronger control is exercised over the norms of production &amp; over professional behavior, owing largely to more substantial research &amp; institutional resources. In terms of formal training, the research in France is conducted mainly in research laboratories, not in graduate departments, as in the US. The hegemony of quantitative sociology in the US is due to the values of populism, anti-intellectualism, &amp; pragmatism, while the dominance of metatheory in French sociology is fostered by the status of French intellectuals. Whereas American sociology is almost exclusively empirically grounded, the historical attraction of individuals from many different fields to sociology in France has caused it to favor nonempirically based research &amp; the hegemony of theory as research activity. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Special 20th anniversary issue on &quot;Intellectual, Political, and Cultural relationships Between France and the United States over the Last Twenty Years.&quot;</style></notes></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Dignity of Working Men: Morality and the Boundaries of Race, Class, and Immigration</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2000</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Russell Sage Foundation </style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">New York, NY</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record></records></xml>