<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lamont, Michèle</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">How Has Bourdieu Been Good to Think With? The Case of the United States</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sociological Forum </style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">27</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">228-237</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lizardo, Omar . 2012. &quot;The Three Phases of Bourdieu’s U.S. Reception: Comment on Lamont.&quot; Sociological Forum 27 (1):238-244. &lt;a href=&quot;http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/lamont/files/lizardo_on__lamont.pdf&quot; data-fid=&quot;54286&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mische, Ann . 2012. &quot;Bourdieu in Contention and Deliberation: Response to Lamont and Lizardo&quot;Sociological Forum 27 (1): 245-250.&lt;a href=&quot;http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/lamont/files/mische_on_lamont.pdf&quot; data-fid=&quot;54291&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</style></notes></record></records></xml>