<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">N.G. Mankiw</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Matthew Weinzierl</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dynamic Scoring: A Back-of-the-Envelope Guide</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Public Economics</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">90</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1415-1433</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;This paper uses the neoclassical growth model to examine the extent to which a tax cut pays for itself through higher economic growth. The model yields simple expressions for the steady-state feedback effect of a tax cut. The feedback is surprisingly large: for standard parameter values, half of a capital tax cut is self-nancing. The paper considers various generalizations of the basic model, including elastic labor supply, general production technologies, departures from innite horizons, and non-neoclassical production settings. It also examines how the steady-state results are modied when one considers the transition path to the steady state.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8-9</style></issue></record></records></xml>