Publications

2010
Polinsky M. What would Humboldt have done about ergativity in 2010?. In: DGfS--200th Anniversary of the Humboldt University. ; 2010. Berlin_slides.1.pdf
Benmamoun E, Montrul S, Polinsky M. White Paper: Prolegomena to Heritage Linguistics. Harvard University. 2010.Abstract
Linguistic theory and experimental studies of language development rest heavily on the notion of the adult, perhaps linguistically stable, native speaker. Native speaker competence and performance are typically the result of normal first language acquisition in a predominantly monolingual environment, with optimal and continuous exposure to the language. The question we pose in this article is what happens when access to input and opportunities to use that native language are less than optimal during language development. We present and discuss the case of heritage speakers, i.e., bilingual speakers of an ethnic or immigrant minority language whose first language does not typically reach native-like attainment in adulthood. By examining the linguistic knowledge of these individuals, we question long-held ideas about the stability of language before the so-called critical period for language development, and the nature of the linguistic system as it develops under reduced input conditions. We present an overview of heritage speakers’ linguistic system and discuss several competing factors that shape this system in adulthood. We also call attention to the tremendous potential this population offers for linguistic research, the language teaching profession, and for society in general.
hl_white_paper_june_12.pdf
Polinsky M. Why Bother with Heritage Speakers?. In: First International Conference on Heritage and Community Languages. UCLA; 2010. Website UCLA_Feb_2010.Polinsky_final_pres.pdf
2009
Gagliardi A, Lidz J, Polinsky M. The acquisition of noun classes in Tsez. In: BUCLD 34. ; 2009. BUposter2009.pdf
Kwon, N., Polinsky M, Kluender R, Lee M. Anaphoric inventories and bound variable interpretation: Evidence from Korean. In: CUNY Sentence Processing Conference. ; 2009. CUNY_2009_Korean.pdf
Kravtchenko E, Polinsky M, Xiang M. Are all subject islands created equal?. In: CUNY Sentence Processing Conference. 2009th ed. UC Davis; 2009. Poster-handout.pdf
Polinsky M. Commentary on Anna Roussou's paper on Greek control. MIT Working Papers on Linguistics. 2009;56. polinsky.proofs.pdf
Ueno M, Polinsky M. Does headedness affect processing?. Journal of Linguistics. 2009;45:675-710. JoL_2009.pdf
Xiang, M., Polinsky, M., Kelly, C., Chen, L., Wang, S. The effect of partial semantic feature match in forward prediction and backward retrieval. In: CUNY Sentence Processing Conference. UC Davis; 2009. Chinese-handout.pdf
Polinsky M, Hyman L. Focus in Aghem. In: Zimmermann M, Fery C Information Structure: Theoretical, Typological, And Experimental Perspectives, Malte Zimmermann, Caroline Fery, 0199570957 Look Inside This Book Information Structure: Theoretical, Typological, And Experimental Perspectives. Oxford University Press; 2009.
Chung S, Polinsky M. Introduction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 2009;27(4).Abstract
This is an introduction to the special issue of NLLT on comparative syntax of Austronesian languages. It surveys the prospects for developing a systematic comparative approach to Austronesian syntax and outlines the benefits of such an approach for syntactic theory. We begin with a brief overview of Austronesian languages, focusing on some typologically unusual aspects of their grammar, and the theoretical explanations that have been proposed for these features. We then survey the articles in the rest of this volume and the theoretical questions they address. A novel feature of this special issue is that each article is followed by a commentary by another Austronesian linguist which engages the same issues from a different perspective. The pairings of article and commentary should give readers a window into the study of Austronesian syntax and its current contributions to linguistic theory.
NLLT_CP.pdf
Polinsky M. Review article: Clause Structure and Adjuncts in Austronesian Languages. Oceanic Linguistics. 2009;48. AN_Adjuncts.review_proofs.pdf
Polinsky M. What breaks in A- and A-bar chains under incomplete acquisition. In: CUNY Sentence Processing Conference. UC Davis; 2009. CUNY2009-chains_poster.latest.pdf
2008
Caponigro I, Polinsky M. Almost everything is relative in the Caucasus. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 18. 2008. SALT_XVIII_Caponigro_Polinsky_sent_08-25-08.pdf
Polinsky M. Gender under incomplete acquisition: Heritage speakers’ knowledge of noun categorization. Heritage Language Journal. 2008;6(1). Gender_Under_Incomplete_Acquisition.pdf
Polinsky M. Heritage Language Narratives. In: Heritage Language Education: A New Field Emerging. Routledge; 2008. p. 149-164. Website Chapter_8_Heritage_Language_Narratives-1.pdf
Polinsky M. Relative clauses in Heritage Russian: Fossilization or divergent grammar?. Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics (FASL). 2008;16. FASL07.Polinsky_updated013108.pdf
Caponigro I, Polinsky M. Relatively speaking (in Circassian). 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) [Internet]. 2008. Website WCCFL27_Caponigro_Polinsky_paper_08-25-08.pdf
Polinsky, M., Shklovsky K. Review of "Hinukh Dictionary". Anthropological Linguistics. 2008;49(3).
Polinsky M, Potsdam E. The syntax and semantics of wanting in Indonesian. Lingua. 2008;118(10):1617-1639. LINGUAoffprint.pdf

Pages