Publications

In Press
Geren J, Snedeker J, Shafto C. The link between language and theory of mind: evidence from internationally adopted children. [Internet]. In Press. Website
Goldstein RN. Literary Spinoza. In: Rocca MD Oxford Handbook of Spinoza. New York: Oxford University Press; In Press.
Huang Y, Snedeker J. Logic and Conversation revisited: Evidence for the division between semantic and pragmatic content in real time language comprehension. [Internet]. In Press. Website
Laleko O, Polinsky M. Marking topic or marking case: A comparative investigation of Heritage Japanese and Heritage Korean. Heritage Language Journal. In Press. hlj_paper_revised_final_version.pdf
Kosslyn SM, Ganis G, Thompson WL. Mental imagery and the human brain. In: Jing J Proceedings of the XXVIIIth International Congress of Psychology. New York: Psychology Press; In Press.
Langer E. Mindfulness and Health.; In Press.
Langer E. Mindfulness at Work.; In Press.
Dilks DD, Julian JB, Kubilius J, Spelke ES, Kanwisher N. Mirror-image sensitivity and invariance in object and scene processing pathways. The Journal of Neuroscience. In Press.
nomoscover.jpg
Beckwith J, Morris-Singer CA. Missing Heritability: Hidden Environment in Genetic Studies of Human Behavior. In: Fleming J, Levinson S NOMOS LII: Evolution and Morality. New York: NYU Press; In Press. p. 122-136.
Weisz JR, Chorpita BF. Mod squad for youth psychotherapy: Restructuring evidence-based treatment for clinical practice. In: Kendall PC Child and adolescent therapy: Cognitive-behavioral procedures, 4th edition. New York: Guilford; In Press.
Hankins J. Monstrous Melancholy: Ficino and the Physiological Causes of Atheism. In: Clucas S, Rees V Laus Platonici philosophi: Marsilio Ficino and His Influence. Brill; In Press.
Greene JD. Morality and Emotion: A Tasting Menu. Emotion Review [Internet]. In Press. Website
Sommer D. Mosaic and Mestizo: Bilingual Love From Hebreo to El Inca. Jewish Studies. In Press.
Corinna S, Pennings P, Foitzik S. Multicolonial population structure and nestmate recognition in an extremely dense population of the European ant Lasius flavus. [Internet]. In Press. Website
de Marchena A, Worek A, Ono K, Eigsti I, Snedeker J. Mutual exclusivity in autism spectrum disorders: Testing the pragmatic hypothesis. [Internet]. In Press. Website
de Marchena A, Worek A, Ono K, Eigsti I, Snedeker J. Mutual exclusivity in autism spectrum disorders: Testing the pragmatic hypothesis. [Internet]. In Press. Website
Kinzler KD, Dupoux E, Spelke ES. "Native" objects and collaborators: Infants’ object choices and acts of giving reflect favor for native over foreign speakers. Journal of Cognition and Development [Internet]. In Press. Website
Hardin CD, Banaji MR. The nature of implicit prejudice: Implications for personal and public policy. In: Shafir E The Behavioral Foundations of Policy. ; In Press.
Ganis G, Morris RR, Kosslyn SM. Neural processes underlying self- and other-related lies: An individual difference approach using fMRI. In Press. 2008ganis_socialneuroscience_preprint_neuralprocessesdeception.pdf
Hooley JM, Gruber SA, Parker HA, Guillaumot C, Rogowska J, Yurgelun-Todd DA. Neural processing of emotional overinvolvement in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. In Press.Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) fare better clinically if their families are rated as being high in emotional overinvolvement, which is characterized by marked emotionality, anxious concern, and protective behavior. This is not true of patients with disorders such as schizophrenia or major depression. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging methods to explore the link between emotional overinvolvement (EOI) and better clinical outcome in BPD. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that, unlike healthy controls or people with other psychiatric problems, people with BPD process EOI as an approach-related stimulus. METHOD: Participants with BPD (n = 13) and dysthymia (n = 10) (DSM-IV criteria for both) and healthy controls (n = 11) were imaged using a high field strength (3T) scanner while they listened to a standardized auditory stimulus consisting of either 4 neutral or 4 EOI comments. Participants also rated their mood before and after exposure to the comments. RESULTS: All participants reported increased negative mood after hearing EOI and rated the EOI comments as negative stimuli. However, after subtracting activation to neutral comments, participants with BPD showed higher activation in left prefrontal regions during EOI compared to the other groups. Increased left prefrontal activation during EOI was also correlated with clinical measures indicative of borderline pathology. Participants with dysthymia showed increased amygdala activation during EOI. This was not true for the healthy controls or participants with BPD. CONCLUSIONS: For people with BPD, EOI may be activating neural circuitry implicated in the processing of approach-related stimuli. Increased left prefrontal activation to EOI may be a vulnerability marker for BPD. These findings may also help explain why BPD patients do better clinically in high EOI family environments.

Pages