Publications

In Press
Thomson JM, Leong V, Goswami U. Auditory processing interventions and developmental dyslexia: A comparison of phonemic and rhythmic approaches. Reading and Writing. In Press.
Horn MS, Leong ZA, Block F, Diamond J, Evans EM, Phillips BC, Shen C. BATs and APEs: Designing an interactive tabletop game for natural history museums. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'12). Austin, Texas: ACM Press; In Press.
Sommer D. Be-longing and Bi-Lingual States. Diacritics. In Press;29(4).
Ebert JP, Wegner DM. Bending time to one’s will. In: Sinnott-Armstrong WP, Nadel L Conscious will and responsibility: A tribute to Benjamin Libet. New York: Oxford University Press; In Press.
Rakoczy H, Hamann K, Warneken F, Tomasello M. Bigger knows better – young children selectively learn rule games from adults rather than from peers. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. In Press.
Wong KHK, Truslow JG, Khankhel AH, Tien J. Biophysical mechanisms that govern the vascularization of microfluidic scaffolds. In: Brey EM Vascularization: Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; In Press.
Hsu CW, Zhen B, Chua S-L, Johnson SG, Joannopoulos JD, Soljačić M. Bloch surface eigenstates within the radiation continuum. Light: Science & Applications. In Press.
Ganis G, Thompson WL, Mast FW, Kosslyn SM. The brain‘s mind‘s images: The cognitive neuroscience of mental imagery. In: Gazzaniga MS The newest cognitive neurosciences, 3rd edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; In Press.
Patrawart K. Can Education Equality Be A New Anti-Corruption Tool?: Cross-Country Evidence: 1990-2005. NACC Journal. In Press;3(2).Abstract
Cross-country evidence shows that corruption could be controlled with support from the education, free press and independent judicial systems, yet the theoretical foundation for such a connection is somewhat limited. This paper investigates the mechanisms behind the anti-corruption effect of education through civic engagement. We argue that equal universal access to education and the free press is a crucial tool for the majority of citizens to acquire the correct information needed to succeed in their anti-corruption initiatives. A simple reduced-form theoretical model, which allows for heterogeneity in educational attainment among agents, is used to explain the link between education equality and corruption. Evidence from cross-national panel data estimation between 1990 and 2005 shows the robust support for the relationship. Education equality has independent and complimentary anti-corruption effects with press freedom and the duration of democracy.
Huang Y, Snedeker J. Cascading activation across levels of representation in children’s lexical processing. [Internet]. In Press. Website
Aldrich J. Case. ReporterName. In Press;ReporterVolume:FirstPage.Abstract
n/a
simple.doc
Sommer D. Cecilia no sabe, o los bloqueos que blanquean. Revista de critica literaria Latinoamericana. In Press.
Schacter DL, Chamberlain J, Gaesser B, Gerlach KD. Chapter. In: Nadel L, Sinnott-Armstrong W Memory and law: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press; In Press.
Ehrenreich-May J, Southam-Gerow MA, Hourigan SE, Wright LR, Pincus DB, Weisz JR. Characteristics of anxious and depressed youth seen in two different clinical contexts. Administration and Policy in Mental Health. In Press.
Gaesser B, Sacchetti DC, Addis DR, Schacter DL. Characterizing agerelated changes in remembering the past and imagining the future. Psychology and Aging. In Press.
Warneken F. Children’s helping hands. In: Brockman M Future Science – 19 Essays from the Cutting Edge. ; In Press.
Olson KR, Dweck CS, Spelke ES, Banaji MR. Children's responses to group-based inequalities: Perpetuation and rectification. Social Cognition. In Press.
Peter K. Bol (General Editor). China Biographical Database. In Press.
Gaule P, Piacentini M. Chinese Graduate Students and U.S. Scientific Productivity. Review of Economics and Statistics. In Press.
Milner H, Tingley D. The Choice for Multilateralism: Foreign Aid and American Foreign Policy. Review of International Organizations. In Press.Abstract
Why do states choose multilateralism? We develop an argument focused on the burden-sharing versus control dilemma of principal-agent (PA) models. We also present two alternative theoretical frames that could explain this choice: a normative logic of appropriateness and hegemonic self binding. We examine the political bases of support for sending foreign aid through multilateral versus bilateral channels. First, we clarify the concept of multilateralism. We show that the choices for internationalism and multilateralism are distinct. Second, we develop hypotheses from each of the three theories and examine how public opinion data allow us to shed light on these different theories about multilateralism. Finally, we provide evidence about the correlates of public support for multilateral engagement. We isolate how two competing rationales—burden sharing and control—dictate some of the politics around the choice between multilateral versus bilateral aid channels. The data support our claim that a principal-agent model can help us to understand the choice for multilateralism.
riomilnertingley.pdf

Pages