@article {703611,
	title = {Fairness and Support for Populist Parties},
	journal = {Comparative Political Studies},
	year = {2023},
	url = { https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140231193013},
	author = {Kim, Sung In and Peter A. Hall}
}
@article {703556,
	title = {The Structural Sources of Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health: A Cross-National Perspective},
	journal = {Socius},
	volume = {9},
	year = {2023},
	pages = {1-17},
	url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/23780231231174832},
	author = {Barnes, L. and Hall, P.A. and Taylor, R.C.R.}
}
@article {691651,
	title = {When and How do Growth Strategies Change?},
	journal = {Stato e Mercato},
	volume = {124},
	number = {April},
	year = {2022},
	pages = {31-52},
	author = {Peter A. Hall}
}
@article {686223,
	title = {Growth Regimes},
	journal = {Business History Review},
	year = {2022},
	author = {Peter A. Hall}
}
@article {674561,
	title = {The Shifting Relationship between Postwar Capitalism and Democracy},
	journal = {Government \& Opposition},
	year = {2022},
	month = {2021},
	author = {Peter A. Hall}
}
@article {637583,
	title = {The Rise of Opportunity Markets: How Did It Happen \&amp; What Can We Do?},
	journal = {Daedalus},
	volume = {148},
	number = {3},
	year = {2019},
	pages = {19-45},
	url = {https://www.amacad.org/publication/rise-opportunity-markets-how-did-it-happen-what-can-we-do},
	author = {David B. Grusky and Peter A. Hall and Hazel Rose Markus}
}
@article {610245,
	title = {The Electoral Politics of Growth Regimes},
	journal = {Perspectives on Politics},
	year = {2019},
	url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-politics/article/electoral-politics-of-growth-regimes/B2E6C55E34429CCDDD57E22B162CD928},
	author = {Peter A. Hall}
}
@article {555566,
	title = {Populism as a Problem of Social integration},
	journal = {Comparative Political Studies},
	year = {2019},
	url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0010414019879947},
	author = {Gidron, Noam and Peter A. Hall}
}
@article {561696,
	title = {The Politics of Social Status: Economic and Cultural Roots of the Populist Right},
	journal = {British Journal of Sociology},
	volume = {51},
	year = {2017},
	month = {November 2017},
	url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1468-4446.12319},
	author = {Gidron, Noam and Peter A. Hall}
}
@article {395561,
	title = {Stanley Hoffmann As Teacher},
	journal = {Special issue of Commentaire},
	year = {2017},
	author = {Peter A. Hall}
}
@article {555731,
	title = {Review of Beramendi et al. The Politics of Advanced Capitalism},
	journal = {Socio-Economic Review},
	volume = {14},
	number = {2},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {383-94},
	author = {Peter A. Hall}
}
@article {451856,
	title = {The Roots of Brexit: 1992, 2004 and European Union Expansion},
	journal = {Foreign Affairs},
	year = {2016},
	month = {June 2016},
	author = {Peter A. Hall}
}
@article {395551,
	title = {Transparency, Research Integrity and Multiple Methods},
	journal = {APSA-CP: Comparative Politics Newsletter},
	year = {2016},
	month = {Spring 2016},
	pages = {32-36},
	author = {Peter A. Hall}
}
@article {395546,
	title = {Social Policy-Making for the Long Term},
	journal = {PS: Political Science and Politics},
	volume = {48},
	number = {2},
	year = {2015},
	month = {April 2015},
	pages = {289-91},
	author = {Peter A. Hall}
}
@article {395531,
	title = {Varieties of Capitalism and the Euro Crisis},
	journal = {West European Politics},
	volume = {37},
	number = {6},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {1223-43},
	author = {Peter A. Hall}
}
@article {395501,
	title = {A Capabilities Approach to Population Health and Public Policy-Making},
	journal = {Revue d{\textquoteright}{\'E}pidemiologie et de Sant{\'e} Publique },
	volume = {61},
	number = {Supp. 3},
	year = {2013},
	month = {August 2013},
	pages = {177-83},
	author = {Peter A. Hall and Rosemary CR Taylor and Lucy Barnes}
}
@article {395516,
	title = {Why Social Relations Matter for Politics and Successful Societies},
	journal = {Annual Review of Political Science},
	volume = {16},
	year = {2013},
	month = {2013},
	pages = {49-71},
	author = {Peter A. Hall and Michele Lamont}
}
@article {395571,
	title = {The Economics and Politics of the Euro Crisis},
	journal = {German Politics},
	volume = {24},
	number = {1},
	year = {2012},
	month = {December 2012},
	pages = {355-71},
	author = {Peter A. Hall}
}
@article {395586,
	title = {How Society Shapes the Health Gradient: Work-Related Health Inequalities in a Comparative Perspective},
	journal = {Annual Review of Public Health},
	volume = {33},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {59-73},
	author = {Christopher B McLeod and Peter A. Hall and Arjumand Siddiqi and Clyde Hertzman}
}
@article {395576,
	title = {The Mythology of European Union},
	journal = {Swiss Political Science Review},
	volume = {18},
	number = {4},
	year = {2012},
	month = {December 2012},
	pages = {5-8-13},
	author = {Peter A. Hall}
}
@article {395581,
	title = {Tracing the Progress of Process Tracing},
	journal = {European Political Science},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {1-11},
	author = {Peter A. Hall}
}
@article {555736,
	title = {Samuel H. Beer and the Possibilities of Politics},
	journal = {British Politics},
	volume = {5},
	number = {1},
	year = {2010},
	pages = {3-13},
	author = {Peter A. Hall}
}
@article {555716,
	title = {Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Political Economy: An Empirical Analysis},
	journal = {British Journal of Political Science},
	volume = {39},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {449-82},
	author = {Peter A. Hall and Daniel Gingerich}
}
@article {8343,
	title = {Why is Wealthier Healthier?},
	journal = {Perspectives on Europe},
	volume = {39},
	number = {2},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {4-8},
	abstract = {"Wealthier is healthier." This characteristically pithy observation by Lant Pritchett and Lawrence H. Summers (1993) summarizes one of the most firmly-established findings about population health. Health is closely related to social class. This "health gradient" shows up in all the developed democracies. On a wide variety of measures, people of higher socioeconomic status tend to be healthier than those on the lower rungs of the socioeconomic ladder. },
	author = {Peter A. Hall and Lucy Barnes and Rosemary R. Taylor}
}
@article {8341,
	title = {Institutional change in varieties of capitalism},
	journal = {Socio-Economic Review},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {7-34},
	abstract = {Contemporary approaches to varieties to capitalism are often criticized for neglecting issues of institutional change. This paper develops an approach to institutional change more extended than the one provided in Hall and Soskice(in Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001) but congruent with its varieties-ofcapitalism perspective. It begins by outlining an approach to institutional stability, which suggests that the persistence of institutions depends not only on their aggregate welfare effects but also on the distributive benefits that they provide to the underlying social or political coalitions; and not only on the Paretooptimal quality of such equilibria but also on continuous processes of mobilization through which the actors test the limits of the existing institutions. It then develops an analysis of institutional change that emphasizes the ways in which defection, reinterpretation and reform emerge out of such contestation and assesses the accuracy of this account against recent developments in the political economies of Europe. The paper concludes by outlining the implications of this perspective for contemporary analyses of liberalization in the political economy.},
	author = {Peter A. Hall and Kathleen Thelen}
}
@article {8101,
	title = {Re-Forming Capitalism},
	journal = {Archives of European Sociology},
	volume = {L},
	number = {3},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {488-494},
	abstract = {Thirty years after the initiatives of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher signaled the beginning of a neo-liberal era that would usher in widespread enthusiasm for competitive markets, the world is experiencing a global recession precipitated by financial crises rooted in the excesses of unbridled competition. As a result, the neoliberal era is at an inflection point, if not a close. Many people are reconsidering what markets can deliver and looking again to states for more assertive efforts to regulate and distribute resources. After several decades of irrational exuberance about what markets could accomplish, scholars are looking at capitalism with more sober eyes.},
	author = {Peter A. Hall}
}
@article {8339,
	title = {The Dilemmas of Contemporary Social Science},
	journal = {boundary 2},
	volume = {34},
	number = {3},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {121-41},
	abstract = {For two hundred years, social science has provided the lens through which people view society and the visions animating most demands for political reform-at least since Adam Smith{\textquoteright}s efforts to unleash the "invisible hand" of the market without destroying the moral sentiments of society. However, the perspectives of social science shift, as each new generation questions its predecessors, with import for politics as well as the academy. From time to time, therefore, we should reflect on them. In this essay, I do so from the perspective of political science, mainly about American scholarship and with no pretense to comprehensiveness, but with a focus on the disciplinary intersections where so many have found Archimedean points.},
	author = {Peter A. Hall}
}
@article {8338,
	title = {Les silences de la France en mutation (French)},
	journal = {Revue Francaise De Science Politique},
	volume = {57},
	number = {2},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {249-51},
	abstract = {La diversit{\'e} des trois regards critiques offerts sur notre ouvrage refl{\`e}te la diversit{\'e} disciplinaire que nous avons voulue {\`a} l{\textquoteright}origine de ce projet, visant {\`a} mobiliser les sciences sociales dans leur diversit{\'e} ({\'e}conomie politique, histoire, sociologie, science politique...) pour comprendre la diversit{\'e} des mutations {\'e}conomiques, sociales et politiques connues par la France au cours des 25 derni{\`e}res ann{\'e}es. Qu{\textquoteright}est-il advenu du dirigisme {\'e}conomique ? du mod{\`e}le social r{\'e}publicain ? de l{\textquoteright}{\'e}tat tout puissant ? Comment comprendre la crise du politique en France ? Tels sont les chantiers sur lesquels notre ouvrage collectif, fruit d{\textquoteright}une longue collaboration entre chercheurs fran{\c c}ais et am{\'e}ricains, fait le point, afin de dresser un tableau aussi complet que possible des mutations fran{\c c}aises. ous avons ainsi trait{\'e}s des mutations du capitalisme fran{\c c}ais (per{\c c}u dans son ensemble par P. Culpepper, puis du point de vue du gouvernement d{\textquoteright}entreprise par M. Goyer et de relations professionnelles par M. Lallement), des {\'e}volutions des piliers de la coh{\'e}sion sociale (contrat entre les g{\'e}n{\'e}rations par L. Chauvel, r{\'e}formes du syst{\`e}me de protection sociale par B. Palier, {\'e}volutions des politiques d{\textquoteright}{\'e}ducation par A. Van Zanten, et des politiques d{\textquoteright}accueil des migrants par V. Guiraudon), de la redistribution des pouvoirs de l{\textquoteright}{\'e}tat (la d{\'e}centralisation par P. Le Gal{\`e}s et le gouvernement europ{\'e}en par A. Smith) avant d{\textquoteright}{\'e}tudier les cons{\'e}quences politiques de ces {\'e}volutions (les comportements politiques des Fran{\c c}ais par R. Balme, la crise de la repr{\'e}sentation par S. Berger et l{\textquoteright}adaptation du syst{\`e}me de parti par G. Grunberg).},
	author = {Peter A. Hall}
}
@article {8336,
	title = {Systematic process analysis: when and how to use it},
	journal = {European Management Review},
	volume = {3},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {24-31},
	abstract = {Challenging the contention that statistical methods applied to large numbers of cases invariably provide better grounds for causal inference, this article explores the value of a method of systematic process analysis that can be applied in a small number of cases. It distinguishes among three modes of explanation - historically specific, multivariate, and theory-oriented - and argues that systematic process analysis has special value for developing theory-oriented explanations. It outlines the steps required to perform such analysis well and illustrates them with reference to Owen{\textquoteright}s investigation of the {\textquoteright}democratic peace{\textquoteright}. Comparing the results available from this kind of method with those from statistical analysis, it examines the conditions under which each method is warranted. Against conceptions of the {\textquoteright}comparative method{\textquoteright} which imply that small-n case-studies provide weak grounds for causal inference, it argues that the intensive examination of a small number of cases can be an appropriate research design for testing such inferences.},
	author = {Peter A. Hall}
}
@article {8335,
	title = {Dialogue on {\textquoteright}Institutional complementarity and political economy{\textquoteright}},
	journal = {Socio-Economic Review},
	volume = {3},
	year = {2005},
	pages = {359-82},
	author = {Peter A. Hall and Colin Crouch and Wolfgang Streeck and Robert Boyer and Bruno Amable and Gregory A. Jackson}
}
@article {555756,
	title = {Social Capital in Britain},
	journal = {British Journal of Political Science},
	volume = {29},
	year = {1999},
	pages = {417-61},
	author = {Peter A. Hall}
}
@article {8320,
	title = {Mixed Signals: Central Bank Independence, CoordinatedWage Bargaining, and European Monetary Union},
	journal = {International Organization},
	volume = {52},
	number = {3},
	year = {1998},
	pages = {505-535},
	abstract = {The nations of the European Union (EU) are taking a major step toward greater economic and political integration by creating a monetary union to be administered by a European central bank that is formally independent of political control. There is broad consensus among the governing elites of Europe, informed by an extensive literature in economics, that the independence of the new central bank will confer important economic advantages on the new European Monetary Union (EMU) as one unintentional publication concluded, {\textquoteright}{\textquoteright}The argument for central bank independence. . . appears overwhelming.{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright}},
	author = {Peter A. Hall and Robert J. Franzese}
}
@article {8319,
	title = {Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms},
	journal = {Political Studies},
	volume = {XLIV},
	year = {1996},
	pages = {936-957},
	abstract = {The {\textquoteright}new institutionalism{\textquoteright} is a term that now appears with growing frequency in political science. However, there is considerable confusion about just what the {\textquoteright}new institutionalism{\textquoteright} is, how it differs from other approaches, and what sort of promise or problems it displays. The object of this essay is to provide some preliminary answers to these questions by reviewing recent work in a burgeoning literature.},
	author = {Peter A. Hall and Rosemary R. Taylor}
}
@article {555746,
	title = {Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policy-Making in Britain},
	journal = {Comparative Politics},
	volume = {25},
	number = {3},
	year = {1993},
	pages = {275-96},
	author = {Peter A. Hall}
}
