@article {bohnet_social_2004,
	title = {Social Comparisons in Ultimatum Bargaining},
	journal = {Scandinavian Journal of Economics},
	volume = {106},
	year = {2004},
	pages = {495{\textendash}510},
	abstract = {Experiments are used to examine the effects of social comparisons in ultimatum bargaining. We inform responders about the average offer before they decide whether to accept or reject their specific offer. This significantly increases offers and offer-specific rejection probabilities. For comparison, we consider another change in informational conditions: telling responders the total pie is \$30{\textemdash}ex ante it was either \$15 or \$30{\textemdash}affects offers and rejection probabilities roughly as much. Our results are consistent with people{\textquoteright}s dislike for deviations from the norm of equity but inconsistent with fairness theories, where people dislike income disparity between themselves and their referents.},
	keywords = {asymmetric information, C91, Experimental bargaining, social comparisons, ultimatum game},
	issn = {1467-9442},
	doi = {10.1111/j.0347-0520.2004.00376.x},
	url = {http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.0347-0520.2004.00376.x/abstract},
	author = {Iris Bohnet, and Richard Zeckhauser}
}
