Publications by Type: Journal Article

Jorgenson, Dale W.Production and Welfare: Progress in Economic Measurement.” Journal of Economic Literature (Forthcoming). Publisher's VersionAbstract

While the GDP was intended by its originators as a measure of production, the absence of a measure of welfare in the national accounts has led to widespread misuse of the GDP to proxy welfare. Measures of welfare are needed to appraise the outcomes of changes in economic policies and evaluate the results. Concepts that describe the income distribution, such as poverty and inequality, fall within the scope of welfare rather than production. This paper reviews recent advances in the measurement of production and welfare within the national accounts, primarily in the United States and the international organizations.  Expanding the framework beyond the national accounts has led to important innovations in the measurement of both production and welfare.[1] JEL Codes: C8, D6, I3, O4.


[1] Acknowledgements: The author is grateful to his collaborators on economic measurement, many for very helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper – Barbara Fraumeni, Frank Gollop, Mun Ho, Steven Landefeld, Koji Nomura, Jon Samuels, Paul Schreyer, Daniel Slesnick, Kevin Stiroh, Marcel Timmer, and Khuong Vu. He is also grateful for comments from Bart van Ark, Diane Coyle, William Nordhaus, Nicholas Oulton, Dirk Philipsen, Rebecca Riley, Amartya Sen, and Peter van de Ven, and from the Office of National Statistics (U.K.) and the Bureau of Economic Analysis (U.S.). He would like to thank the Editor and two anonymous referees for their comments and suggestions. Financial support for this research was provided by the Donald Marron Center for Economic Data at Harvard University. None of the foregoing is responsible for any remaining deficiencies of the paper.

Jorgenson, Dale W., and Paul Schreyer. “Measuring Individual Well-Being and Social Welfare within the Framework of the System of National Accounts.” Review of Income and Wealth 63, no. Supplement 2 (2017): S460-S477. Publisher's VersionAbstract
While the agenda of “beyond GDP” encompasses measurements that lie outside boundaries of the System of National Accounts, key aspects of individual well-being and social welfare can be incorporated into an SNA framework. We bring together the relevant theoretical literature and the empirical tools needed for this purpose. We show how consumption-based measures of economic welfare can be integrated into the national accounts without changing their production or asset boundary. At the same time, explicit normative and methodological choices are required to select a social welfare function. The paper provides guidance how to make these choices transparent and how to present social welfare measures.
Jorgenson, Dale W., and Khuong M. Vu. “The Outlook for Advanced Economies.” Journal of Policy Modeling 39, no. 4 (2017): 660-672. Publisher's VersionAbstract

According to the authoritative estimates of Angus Maddison, the United States was the world’s largest economy throughout the twentieth century.[1] International economic cooperation among the world’s industrialized countries began to take its contemporary form with the formation of the G7 in 1975 and 1976. The G7 includes the U.S., the four major European countries – France, Germany, Italy, and the U.K – as well as Canada and Japan.

During most of the twentieth century a fundamental transformation of the world economy seemed a remote and unlikely prospect. However, in the twenty-first century the balance of the world economy is shifting from the industrialized economies, led by Europe, Japan, and the United States, to the emerging economies of Asia, especially China and India. The massive shift in the world economy is generating a new world order.

The World Bank’s 2005 International Comparison Program (ICP2005) showed that China had overtaken Japan in terms of purchasing power more than a decade earlier.[2] By 2012 India had overtaken Japan and has continued to grow much more rapidly. The World Bank’s 2011 International Comparison Program (ICP2011) revealed that China’s output achieved parity with the United States in terms of purchasing power in 2014.[3]  

Our first major finding is that world economic growth has accelerated during the twenty-first century. While world economic growth will continue at a rapid pace, we project that all the members of the G7 will grow more slowly that the world economy, while China and India will continue to grow more rapidly. However, Chinese economic growth has already slowed and Indian growth will follow. The Chinese and Indian economies will continue to increase in relative importance during the twenty-first century as the rate of growth of the world economy gradually declines.

In 2001 Jim O’Neill, then a Goldman-Sachs economist, originated the terminology “BRIC” economies -- Brazil, Russia, India, and China.[4] For many purposes the G7 was superseded by the G20 in 2009, including the G7 as well as the four BRIC countries, eight other countries, and the European Union. The four BRIC countries formed a group to meet before the G20 and added South Africa, becoming the “BRICS”.  The G7 countries participate actively in the G20 and have formed a similar group.  

The second major finding of this paper is that Brazil and Russia, as well as Germany, Japan, and the United States, will grow more slowly than the world economy. The leading economies in developing and implementing the Asian model of economic growth were, first, Japan, then the Asian Tigers – Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan – and finally China and India. The performance of these Asian economies has changed the course of economic development in Asia and around the world.

The Asian model of economic growth relies on globalization and investment in human and non-human capital, rather than innovation. This new growth paradigm places a high premium on skillful management by public and private authorities. Of course, investment and innovation are analytical categories for characterizing different aspects of the complex processes that generate long-term growth and structural change.

The third major finding of this paper is that replication rather than innovation is the major source of growth of the world economy. Replication takes place by adding identical production units with no change in technology. Labor input grows through the addition of new members of the labor force with the same education and experience. Capital input expands by providing new production units with the same collection of plant and equipment. Output expands in proportion with no change in productivity. By contrast, successful innovation involves the creation of new products and new processes, so that productivity increases.

Recovery of the industrialized economies from the Great Recession that began in the United States in 2007-2009 has been slow and fitful. The United States has emerged with low unemployment but reduced prospects for growth. Japan has continued to languish in the Lost Decades, awaiting the successful implementation of a new growth strategy. The fiscal and financial burden of public debt and the challenges of coping with the financial crisis in Greece pose potential threats to the restoration of growth in Europe.

The most significant impact of the Great Recession on the emerging economies of Asia was the collapse of trade in late 2008 and early 2009. This was quickly reversed and the leading Asian economies have continued to grow more rapidly than the world economy. The challenges facing these economies are different but equally daunting. Can China cope with the financial and economic pressures that followed a vast expansion of lending in response to the economic crisis? Will India succeed with fiscal consolidation and restoration of growth?

The growing significance of the Asian model is overturning long-established theories of economic growth and accelerating overdue revisions of the official economic statistics. The ruling theories of growth of the twentieth century put enormous weight on innovation, which has played a relatively modest role. This view has neglected investments in human and nonhuman capital, which are much more important for advanced economies as well as emerging economies. The new economic order will help to establish this empirically-based view of the sources of economic growth.

In this paper we set aside short-term threats to the world economy to focus on the potential for long-term growth. We show that the fundamentals of the world economy remain sound. We recognize the emergence of Asia from the underdevelopment that persisted until the middle of the twentieth century as the great economic achievement of our time. Trends established in the watershed reforms of China and India more than two decades ago have produced the dramatic changes of economic leadership in the twenty-first century.


[1] Angus Maddison (2001), The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective, Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, 2001. See:

[2]  World Bank (2008), 2005 International Comparison Program, February. See:

[3] World Bank (2014) , 2011 International Comparison Program, October. See:

[4] O’Neill’s book describing the progress of the BRIC was published in 2011: Jim O’Neill (2011), The Growth Map: Economic Opportunity in the BRICs and Beyond, New York, Penguin.

Jorgenson, Dale W.Productivity and Economic Growth in the World Economy: An Introduction.” International Productivity Monitor: Special Issue from the Fourth World KLEMS Conference 33, no. Fall (2017): 1-7. Publisher's Version ipm.4th.world_.klems_.conference.pdf
Jorgenson, Dale W., and Khuong Minh Vu. “The Outlook for Emerging Economies.” Journal of Policy Modeling 38, no. 4 (2016): 670-682. Publisher's Version
Jorgenson, Dale W.Econometric General Equilibrium Modeling.” Journal of Policy Modeling 38, no. 3 (2016): 436-447. Publisher's VersionAbstract

The point of departure for the study of the impact of energy and environmental policies is the neo-classicaltheory of economic growth formulated by Cass (1965) and Koopmans (1967). The long-run properties ofeconomic growth models are independent of energy and environmental policies. However, these policiesaffect capital accumulation and rates of productivity growth that determine the intermediate-run trends thatare important for policy evaluation.

Heterogeneity of different energy producers and consumers is critical for the implementation of energyand environmental policies. To capture this heterogeneity it is necessary to distinguish among commodities,industries, and households. Econometric methods are essential for summarizing information on differentindustries and consumer groups in a form suitable for general equilibrium modeling.

In this paper we consider the application of econometric general equilibrium modeling to the U.S., theeconomy that has been studied most intensively. The framework for our analysis is provided by the Intertem-poral General Equilibrium Model (IGEM) introduced by Jorgenson and Wilcoxen (1990). The new versionof the IGEM presented in this paper is employed for the evaluation of proposed legislation on climate policyby the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2011).© 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Society for Policy Modeling.

Jorgenson, Dale W., and Khuong M. Vu. “Australia and the Growth of the World Economy: 24th Colin Clark Memorial Lecture.” Economic Analysis and Policy 47, no. September (2015): 90-100.
Jorgenson, Dale W., Mun S. Ho, and Jon D. Samuels. “The Impact of Information Technology on Postwar U.S. Economic Growth.” Telecommunications Policy November (2015).
Jorgenson, Dale W, and Daniel T Slesnick. “Measuring Social Welfare in the National Accounts.” Eurona 2, no. 1 (2014): 39-58. Publisher's Version eurona.2014.p2-measuring_social_welfare_in_the_national_accounts.pdf
Jorgenson, Dale W, Mun S Ho, and Jon D Samuels. “What Will Revive U.S. Economic Growth.” Journal of Policy Modeling 35, no. 3 (2014): 674-691. Publisher's Version
Jorgenson, Dale W, and Paul Schreyer. “Industry-level Productivity Measurement and the 2008 System of National Accounts.” Review of Income and Wealth 59 (2013): 185–211. Publisher's Version jorgenson-schreyer_productivity_and_national_accounts_3_.pdf
Jorgenson, Dale, and Khuong Vu. “The Emergence of the New Economic Order.” Journal of Policy Modeling 35, no. 3 (2013): 389-399. Publisher's Version jorgenson-vu_jpm_13-02-05.pdf
Jorgenson, Dale W, and Khuong Vu. “The Rise of Developing Asia and The New Economic Order.” Journal of Policy Modeling 33, no. 5 (2011): 698-751. PDF
Jorgenson, Dale W, and Marcel P Timmer. “Structural Change in Advanced Nations.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 113, no. 1 (2011): 1-29.Abstract

We provide new evidence on patterns of structural change in advanced economies, reconsidering the stylised facts put forward by Kaldor (1963), Kuznets (1971), and Maddison (1980). Since 1980, the services sector has overwhelmingly predominated in the economic activity of the European Union, Japan, and the US, but there is substantial heterogeneity among services. Personal, finance, and business services have low productivity growth and increasing shares in employment and GDP. By contrast, shares of distribution services are constant, and productivity growth is rapid. We find that the labour share in value-added is declining, while the use of ICT capital and skilled labour is increasing in all sectors and regions.

Jorgenson, Dale W. “Innovation and Productivity Growth.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93, no. 2 (2011): 276-296. PDF
Jorgenson, Dale, and Khuong Vu. “Potential Growth of the World Economy.” Journal of Policy Modeling 32, no. 5 (2010): 615-631.Abstract
This paper introduces a new framework for projecting potential growth of the world economy, emphasizing the contribution of information technology. We first analyze the sources of economic growth for the world economy, seven regions, and fourteen major economies during four periods – 1989-1995, 1995-2000, 2000-2004, and 2004-2008. The contribution of investment in information technology has increased in all regions, but especially in industrialized economies and Developing Asia. We then project the potential growth rates of labor productivity and GDP for 122 economies over the ten-year period 2009-2019. Relative to historical growth for 1989-2008, we project lower growth rates for productivity and GDP.
Jin, Hui, and Dale Jorgenson. “Econometric Modeling of Technical Change.” Journal of Econometrics 157, no. 2 (2010): 205-219. PDF Supplement
Jorgenson, Dale. “Human Capital and the National Accounts.” Survey of Current Business 90, no. 6 (2010): 54-56. PDF
Jorgenson, Dale W. “Designing a New Architecture for the U.S. National Accounts to Capture Innovation.” Survey of Current Business 90, no. 2 (2010): 17-23. PDF
Jorgenson, Dale W. “Designing a New Architecture for the U.S. National Accounts.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 631, no. 1 (2010): 63-74. PDF