Property Law Developments

Eighth Circuit holds that videographers have First Amendment free speech right to refuse to provide services at same-sex weddings

In Telescope Media Group v. Lucero, 936 F.3d 740 (8^th Cir. 2019), the Eighth Circuit held that Minnesota could not enforce its public accommodations law against a company that refused to provide video services for same-sex weddings. The process of producing a video, the court said, constitutes “speech” and would be posted on the company’s website....

State constitutional and statutory right in Arizona to refuse to create custom wedding invitations for same-sex couples

In a 4-3 decision, the Arizona Supreme Court has interpreted its constitution, Ariz. Const. art. 2, §6, and its Free Exercise of Religion Act, Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 41-1493.01, to give a public accommodation the right to refuse service to same-sex couples who seek custom wedding invitations. ...

Mall owners liable for commercial tenant's sales of counterfeit sunglasses

The Eleventh Circuit has held a commercial landlord liable for its tenant's sales of counterfeit sunglasses when it knew of those sales and failed to stop them. Luxottica Group, S.p.A. v. Airport Mini Mall LLC, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 23555 (11th Cir. 2019). The claim was for contributory trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, 15... Read more about Mall owners liable for commercial tenant's sales of counterfeit sunglasses

No easement by necessity to access fire escape

No easement by necessity exists that would allow a condo owner to pass through another condo to reach a fire escape. Nor was there an express easement even though the condo documents gave the unit owner the right to use the fire escape. Chamberlain v. Badaoui, 95 Mass App. Ct. 670, 2019 Mass. App. LEXIS 93, 2019 WL 3334700 (Mass. App. Ct. 2019). No express right to go through the neighboring unit to get to the fire escape was created and the court refused to create one by... Read more about No easement by necessity to access fire escape

Easement owner who exceeds the scope of the easement can obtain new use rights by prescription

Owner of an easement of passage that also uses the land without permission to park a car, use the area as a yard and maintain the lawn exceeds the scope of the easement and if done for the statutory period can obtain an easement by prescription for the longstanding uses. Savoie v. Zaniboni, 27 LCR 165, 2019 Mass. LCR LEXIS 58, 2019 WL 1511101 (Mass. Land Ct. 2019). The court applies the traditional presumption that uses of another's land are nonpermissive unless evidence of permission is present.

Abandonment of an easement shown when fence closes access to it

Owners built a retaining wall and deck that completely excluded the neighbor from use of the strip of land, thereby extinguishing the easement by prescription since these acts "render[ed] use of [the] easement practically impossible" for the statutory period. Giannelli Mgmt. & Dev. Corp. v. MPA...

Federal court allows public accommodation to refuse to create custom videos of same-sex weddings

In a 2 to 1 vote, the Eight Circuit has held that the First Amendment prohibits a state from enforcing its public accommodations law if it requires videographers to create custom videotapes of same-sex weddings even though they provide this service to opposite-sex weddings. Telescope Media Group v. Lucero, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 25320 (8th Cir. 2019). Because the videos will be edited and posted on the videographer's website, the majority accepted the defendant's argument that they would convey a message of support for same-sex marriage contrary to the... Read more about Federal court allows public accommodation to refuse to create custom videos of same-sex weddings

Section 8 recipients denied right to file §1983 suit for wrongful termination of benefits

The Eleventh Circuit has overruled Basco v. Manchin, 514 F.3d 1177 (11th Cir. 2008) and held that federal law does not empower housing choice voucher (Section 8) holders to bring civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. §1983 to contest wrongful termination of benefits by a housing authority. Yarbrough v. Decatur Housing Auth....

Trespass to use mineral rights one property to extract minerals from a neighboring parcel.

The West Virginia Supreme Court held that a mineral owner or lessee that has the right to use the surface of one parcel to extract minerals or oil or gas from that parcel does not have the right to use that access to take minerals from neighboring parcels whose owners conferred no such rights. EQT Production Co. v. Crowder,2019 W. Va....

California limits enforceability of private transfer fees.

California passed a statute prohibited private transfer fees unless used exclusively to support the encumbered property or cultural, education, charitable, recreational, environmental, conservation, or similar activities. Cal. Civ. Code §1098.6 (2018 Cal. Stat. ch. 306).

...

Joseph William Singer

Bussey Professor of Law, Harvard Law School