The Kansas Supreme Court has held that restrictive covenants are "property" rights within the meaning of the fourteenth amendment and cannot be violated by government without payment of just compensation. Creegan v. Kansas, 391 P.3d 37 (Kan. 2017).
Joseph William Singer
Bussey Professor of Law, Harvard Law School
Categories
- Adverse Possession (30)
- Antidiscrimination Law (105)
- Co-ops (1)
- Concurrent or common ownership (14)
- Condominiums & Homeowners Associations (18)
- Consumer Protection (66)
- Contracts clause (1)
- Copyright (2)
- Due Process (20)
- Easements (64)
- Eminent Domain (5)
- Environmental Law (9)
- Estates & future interests (35)
- Fair Housing Act (44)
- Fourth amendment (unreasonable search of property) (3)
- Free Speech (14)
- Gender identity (5)
- Historic preservation law (2)
- Homelessness (9)
- Intellectual Property (13)
- Leaseholds (65)
- Legal Theory (2)
- Marital Property (37)
- Mortgages (71)
- Nuisance (33)
- Personal Property (13)
- Real Estate Transactions (153)
- Religious Freedom (20)
- Restraints on Alienation (22)
- Servitudes (91)
- Sexual Orientation (50)
- Statute of Frauds (36)
- Takings (61)
- Title Issues (46)
- Trademarks (4)
- Trespass (57)
- Tribal Property (13)
- Trusts (3)
- Water Rights (7)
- Wills and Inheritance (12)
- Zoning (30)
Blog posts by month
- August 2023 (7)
- June 2023 (1)
- May 2023 (3)
- February 2023 (2)
- January 2023 (2)
- 1 of 22
- ยป
