The Role of Consequences, Comparison and Counterfactuals in Constructivist Ethical Thought

Citation:

Sikkink, Kathryn. 2008. “The Role of Consequences, Comparison and Counterfactuals in Constructivist Ethical Thought.” Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, edited by Richard M. Price, 83–111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Copy at https://tinyurl.com/yalm7k5y

Download

Full Chapter

20.02 MB

Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics.jpg

Notes:

Used with permission.

Publisher's Version

Pubs by Type

Pubs by Year

2012 (4)
2011 (3)
2010 (1)
2009 (2)
2008 (5)
2007 (1)
2006 (1)
2005 (2)
2004 (1)
2003 (2)

Recent Pubs

Russia's Willing Collaborators - Translated into Ukrainian

Geoff Dancy, Kathryn Sikkink, Mykhailo Soldatenko Patrick Vinck. 2023. “Russia's Willing Collaborators - Translated into Ukrainian.” Ukpravda. Publisher's Version

yakoyu_maie_buti_lyustraciya_v_ukrayini_pislya_viyni_ukrayinska_pravda.pdf

Russia's Willing Collaborators

Geoff Dancy, Kathryn Sikkink, Mykhailo Soldatenko Patrick Vinck. 2023. “Russia's Willing Collaborators.” Foreign Affairs. Publisher's Version

russias_willing_collaborators_foreign_affairs.pdf

Price, Richard, and Kathryn Sikkink. 2021. International Norms, Moral Psychology, and Neuroscience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Publisher's Version Abstract

Research on international norms has yet to answer satisfactorily some of our own most important questions about the origins of norms and the conditions under which some norms win out over others. The authors argue that international relations (IR) theorists should engage more with research in moral psychology and neuroscience to advance theories of norm emergence and resonance. This Element first provides an overview of six areas of research in neuroscience and moral psychology that hold particular promise for norms theorists and international relations theory more generally. It next surveys existing literature in IR to see how literature from moral psychology is already being put to use, and then recommends a research agenda for norms researchers engaging with this literature. The authors do not believe that this exchange should be a one-way street, however, and they discuss various ways in which the IR literature on norms may be of interest and of use to moral psychologists, and of use to advocacy communities.

Kathryn Sikkink

Citation:

Notes:

Pubs by Type

Pubs by Year

Recent Pubs

styles-hks