Mankiw NG. The Covid-19 Recession of 2020. In: Macroeconomics. 11th ed. ; Forthcoming. PDF
Mankiw NG. How to Increase Taxes on the Rich (If You Must). In: Combating Inequality, edited by Olivier Blanchard and Dani Rodrik. ; Forthcoming. PDF
Mankiw NG. The Past and Future of Econ 101: The John R. Commons Award Lecture. Prepared for AEA Meeting, January. 2020. PDF
Mankiw NG. A Skeptic's Guide to Modern Monetary Theory. Prepared for AEA Meeting, January. 2020. PDF
Mankiw NG. Six Guidelines for Teaching Intermediate Macroeconomics. Journal of Economic Education [Internet]. 2019;June. Publisher's Version PDF
Mankiw NG. Reflections of a Textbook Author. 2019. PDF
Mankiw NG. Snake-Oil Economics: The Bad Math Behind Trump's Policies. Foreign Affairs. 2019;98 (1) :176-180. PDF
Mankiw NG, Reis R. Friedman's Presidential Address in the Evolution of Macroeconomic Thought. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2018;32 (1) :81-96. PDF
Mankiw NG. The Economics of Healthcare. 2017. PDF
Mankiw NG. [Comment] On Welfare Economics in the Principles Course. Journal of Economic Education. 2017;48 (1) :27-28. PDF
Mankiw NG. The Tradeoff between Nuance and Clarity. Eastern Economic Journal. 2016;42 :169-170. PDF
Mankiw NG. CEA Reflection. Box from Economic Report of the President, February 2016, Chapter 7. 2016. PDF
Mankiw NG. Yes, r > g. So What?. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings. 2015;105 (5) :43-47. PDF
Mankiw NG. Defending the One Percent. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2013;27 (3) :21-34. PDF
Mankiw NG, Reis R. Imperfect Information and Aggregate Supply. Handbook of Monetary Economics. 2011. PDF
Mankiw NG, Weinzierl M. An Exploration of Optimal Stabilization Policy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 2011; Spring : 209-272.Abstract

This paper examines the optimal response of monetary and fi…scal policy to a decline in aggregate demand. The theoretical framework is a two-period general equilibrium model in which prices are sticky in the short run and flexible in the long run. Policy is evaluated by how well it raises the welfare of the representative household. While the model has Keynesian features, its policy prescriptions di¤er signi…cantly from textbook Keynesian analysis. Moreover, the model suggests that the commonly used "bang for the buck" calculations are potentially misleading guides for the welfare e¤ects of alternative …fiscal policies.

PDF Appendix
Principles of Economics, 5th edition
Mankiw NG. Principles of Economics, 5th edition. South-Western Cengage Learning; 2011. Website 4th Edition 3rd Edition 2nd Edition
Mankiw NG. Spreading the Wealth Around: Reflections Inspired by Joe the Plumber. Eastern Economic Journal. 2010;36 :285-298.Abstract

This essay discusses the policy debate concerning optimal taxation and the distribution of income. It begins with a brief overview of trends in income inequality, the leading hypothesis to explain these trends, and the distribution of the tax burden. It then considers the normative question of how the tax system should be designed. The conventional utilitarian framework is found to be wanting, as it leads to prescriptions that conflict with many individuals’ moral intuitions. The essay then explores an alternative normative framework, dubbed the Just Deserts Theory, according to which an individual’s compensation should reflect his or her social contribution.

Mankiw NG, Weinzierl M. The Optimal Taxation of Height: A Case Study in Utilitarian Income Redistribution. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy. 2010;2 (1) :155-176.Abstract

Should the income tax system include a tax credit for short taxpayers and a tax surcharge for tall ones? This paper shows that the standard Utilitarian framework for tax policy analysis answers this question in the a¢ rmative. Moreover, based on the empirical distribution of height and wages, the optimal height tax is substantial: a tall person earning $50,000 should pay about $4,500 more in taxes than a short person earning the same income. This result has two possible interpretations. One interpretation is that individual attributes correlated with wages, such as height, should be considered more widely for determining tax liabilities. Alternatively, if policies such as a tax on height are rejected, then the standard Utilitarian framework must in some way fail to capture our intuitive notions of distributive justice.