@article {629487,
	title = {Design, Identification, and Sensitivity Analysis for Patient Preference Trials},
	journal = {Journal of the American Statistical Association},
	volume = {114},
	number = {528},
	year = {2019},
	month = {2019},
	pages = {1532-1546},
	abstract = {Social and medical scientists are often concerned that the external validity of experimental results may be compromised because of heterogeneous treatment effects. If a treatment has different effects on those who would choose to take it and those who would not, the average treatment effect estimated in a standard randomized controlled trial (RCT) may give a misleading picture of its impact outside of the study sample. Patient preference trials (PPTs), where participants{\textquoteright} preferences over treatment options are incorporated in the study design, provide a possible solution. In this paper, we provide a systematic analysis of PPTs based on the potential outcomes framework of causal inference. We propose a general design for PPTs with multi-valued treatments, where participants state their pre- ferred treatments and are then randomized into either a standard RCT or a self-selection condition. We derive nonparametric sharp bounds on the average causal effects among each choice-based sub- population of participants under the proposed design. We also propose a sensitivity analysis for the violation of the key ignorability assumption sufficient for identifying the target causal quantity. The proposed design and methodology are illustrated with an original study of partisan news media and its behavioral impact.},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2019.1585248},
	author = {Dean Knox and Teppei Yamamoto and Baum, Matthew A. and Adam Berinsky}
}
