Abstract
The chapter discusses how ICT can be used to enhance the understanding of the relationship between space, users and social practices. As an example of possible use of ICT for capturing and better understanding user’s needs, the new digital tool WAY Cyberparks is presented and discussed. A “cyberpark” is defined as a new type of urban landscape where nature and ICTs blend together to generate hybrid experiences and enhance quality of life. The WAY Cyberparks digital tool consists of a smart phone application, server/cloud and web services. Through the experiences from testing it in selected urban open spaces in Barcelona, Lisbon and Ljubljana opportunities are presented and lessons are drawn about relevant aspects of the ICT towards building a more participatory and collaborative process in planning of public spaces. A relevant aspect of the ICT lays in their ability to enhance communication with (potential) users, transforming the production of public open spaces into an interactive process, and enabling creative community participation and empowerment. Furthermore, some challenges of the increasing penetration of digital technologies devices (smart phones, smart watches, tablets, etc.) within the broader context of their use in public urban open spaces such as parks, gardens, squares, plazas are discussed, together with the consequences of this interweaving, which is growing at a rapid pace, unfolds research needs in the future.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
This work is based upon work from COST Action TU 1306 Cyberparks, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) 2014–2018, www.cyberparks-project.eu.
References
Bahillo, A., Golicnik Marušic, B., Perallos, A. (2015). A mobile application as an unobtrusive tool for behavioural mapping in public spaces. In Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence. LNCS, Springer (accepted for publication).
Berman, M. G., Jonides, J., & Kaplan, S. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1207–1212. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x
Bettanini, T. (1982). Espaço e Ciências Humanas. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
Ferrara, L. (1993). Olhar Periférico. São Paulo: EDUSP/FAPESP.
Fyfe, N. R. (Ed.). (1998). Images of the street—Planning, identity and control in public space. Routledge: London and New York.
Grech, G. (2015). Cities as platforms. Retrieved on August 10, 2015 from http://techcrunch.com/2015/08/07/cities-as-platforms
GreenKeys Project. (2008). GreenKeys @ Your city—A guide for urban green quality. IOER, Dresden. Retrieved from www.greenkeys-project.net
Hicks, L., & Higgins, J. (2010). Exergaming: Syncing physical activity and learning. Strategies: A Journal for Physical and Sport Educators, 24(1), 18–21. doi:10.1080/08924562.2010.10590908
Ioannidis, K., Smaniotto Costa, C., Šuklje-Erjavec, I., Menezes, M., Bahillo Martínez, A. (2015). The lure of CyberPark—Synergistic outdoor interactions between public spaces, users and locative technologies. In I. Theona & C. Dimitris (Eds.), Hybrid city: Data to the people (pp. 272–281). Athens: URIAC
Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169–182. doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). Experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lévy, F. P., Segaud, M. (1983). Anthropologie de L’Espace. Paris: Centre, Georges Pompidou/CCI.
Menezes, M. (2003). Da construção social do espaço à prevenção socio-urbanística. Urbanismo Preventivo, Colecção Fórum, 6. Lisboa: URBE.
Menezes, M. (2010). Ser urbano em espaço público: Captar a (in)visibilidade das práticas de (in)sustentabilidade urbana. In M. F.Gomes & M. J. Barbosa (Eds.). Cidade e Sustentabilidade: Mecanismos de Controle e Resistência (pp. 41–58). Rio de Janeiro: Terra Vermelha.
Menezes, M. (2012). L’espace du social dans un monde de (multi)représentations socio-spatiales: meta-réflexion méthodologique à partir d’un regard géo-anthropologique. In C. Cerreti, I. Dumont, & M. Tabusi (Eds.), Geografia Sociale e Democrazia – La Sfida della Communicazione (pp. 87–94). Roma: Aracne Editrice.
Nelson, P. (2015). The complete integrated city. Retrieved on November 19, 2015 from http://depts.washington.edu/open2100/Resources/1_OpenSpaceSystems/Open_Space_Systems/BarcelonaCaseStudy.pdf
Pallares-Barbera, M., Badia, A., & Duch, J. (2011). Cerda and Barcelona: The need for a new city and service provision. Urbani izziv Urban Challenge, 2(22), 122–136.
Silberberg, S., Lorah, K., Disbrow, R., Muessig, A. (2013). Places in the making: How placemaking builds places and communities. Retrieved on October 15, 2015 from http://dusp.mit.edu/cdd/project/placemaking
Smaniotto Costa, C. (2012). De quintas a parques. Visitando os Parques da Quinta das Conchas e da Quinta dos Lilases em Lisboa. Arquitextos (pp. 1–11). www.vitruvius.com.br/revistas/read/arquitextos/13.146/4429
Smaniotto Costa, C. (2014). Can we change processes in our cities? Reflections on the role of urban mobility in strengthening sustainable green infrastructures. Journal of Traffic and Logistics Engineering, 2(2), 141–155.
Smaniotto Costa, C., Menezes, M., & Mateus, D. (2014). How would tourists use green spaces? Case studies in Lisbon. Entretextos (Vol. 52). Lisbon. www.ceied.ulusofona.pt/pt/investigacao/publicacoes/entretextos
Šuklje Erjavec, I. (1994). Relationship between form and function in landscape architecture (Master of Science Thesis M.SC.). Department of Landscape Architecture, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana.
Šuklje Erjavec I. (2001). Overlooked potentials of open spaces—New types and categories of urban landscapes. Urbani izziv 2, Prenova mesta - odprti prostor, no 12, Ljubljana: UPIRS.
Šuklje Erjavec, I. (2010). Designing an urban park as a contemporary user-friendly place. In B. Golicnik Marušić & M. Nikšič (Eds.), Human cities—Celebrating public space (pp. 39–51). Oostkamp: Stichting Kunstboek.
Šuklje Erjavec, I. (2012). Pomen in možnosti uporabe zunanjega prostora šol v vzgojno-izobraževalnem procesu. Sodob pedagog 63(1), 156–174.
Šuklje Erjavec, I., & Goličnik, B. (2006). Potrebe, navade in pričakovanja prebivalcev v stanovanjskih krajinah. In V. D. Gazvoda & M. Simoneti (ur.), Stanovanjske krajine: trendi, perspektive : zbornik predavanj in prispevkov ob Konferenci Stanovanjske krajine, Ljubljana (pp. 34–37). Ljubljana: BF, Oddelek za krajinsko arhitekturo, Trajekt, zavod za prostorsko kulturo.
Thompson, C. W. (2002). Urban open space in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60(2), 59–72.
Thompson, C. W., & Travlou, P. (Eds.). (2007). Open space: People space. Abingdon: Routledge.
Tschumi, B. (1983). Parc de la Villette. Paris: Tschumi Architects.
Turner, M. (2004). Urban parks as partners in youth development. In: Beyond recreation—A broader view of urban park (pp. 1–7). The Urban Institute, The Wallace Foundation. doi:10.1037/e688712011-001
UNO. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Retrieved on October 15, 2015 from www.un.org
Whyte, W. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. Washington: The Conservation Foundation.
Wilkins, K., Obregon, R., & Tufte, T. (2014). The handbook of development communication and social change. Wiley,. doi:10.1002/9781118505328.ch0
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smaniotto Costa, C., Bahillo Martínez, A., Álvarez, F.J., Šuklje Erjavec, I., Menezes, M., Pallares-Barbera, M. (2017). Digital Tools for Capturing User’s Needs on Urban Open Spaces: Drawing Lessons from Cyberparks Project. In: Certomà, C., Dyer, M., Pocatilu, L., Rizzi, F. (eds) Citizen Empowerment and Innovation in the Data-Rich City. Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47904-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47904-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47903-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47904-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)