Turban J, Beckwith N, Reisner S, Keuroghlian A.
Association Between Recalled Exposure to Gender Identity Conversion Efforts and Psychological Distress and Suicide Attempts Among Transgender Adults [Internet]. JAMA Psychiatry 2019;77(1):1-9.
LinkAbstract
Importance Gender identity conversion efforts (GICE) have been widely debated as potentially damaging treatment approaches for transgender persons. The association of GICE with mental health outcomes, however, remains largely unknown.
Objective To evaluate associations between recalled exposure to GICE (by a secular or religious professional) and adult mental health outcomes.
Design, Setting, and Participants In this cross-sectional study, a survey was distributed through community-based outreach to transgender adults residing in the United States, with representation from all 50 states, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, and US military bases overseas. Data collection occurred during 34 days between August 19 and September 21, 2015. Data analysis was performed from June 8, 2018, to January 2, 2019.
Exposure Recalled exposure to GICE.
Main Outcomes and Measures Severe psychological distress during the previous month, measured by the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (defined as a score ≥13). Measures of suicidality during the previous year and lifetime, including ideation, attempts, and attempts requiring inpatient hospitalization.
Results Of 27 715 transgender survey respondents (mean [SD] age, 31.2 [13.5] years), 11 857 (42.8%) were assigned male sex at birth. Among the 19 741 (71.3%) who had ever spoken to a professional about their gender identity, 3869 (19.6%; 95% CI, 18.7%-20.5%) reported exposure to GICE in their lifetime. Recalled lifetime exposure was associated with severe psychological distress during the previous month (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.56; 95% CI, 1.09-2.24; P < .001) compared with non-GICE therapy. Associations were found between recalled lifetime exposure and higher odds of lifetime suicide attempts (aOR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.60-3.24; P < .001) and recalled exposure before the age of 10 years and increased odds of lifetime suicide attempts (aOR, 4.15; 95% CI, 2.44-7.69; P < .001). No significant differences were found when comparing exposure to GICE by secular professionals vs religious advisors.
Conclusions and Relevance The findings suggest that lifetime and childhood exposure to GICE are associated with adverse mental health outcomes in adulthood. These results support policy statements from several professional organizations that have discouraged this practice.
Praschan N, Beckwith N, McDowell M, Wininger B, Ivkovic A, Beach S.
Poster 087 - Psychosis and Epilepsy in a 48-year-old Latina Woman Following Surgical Correction of a Tegmen Tympani Encephalocele [Internet]. Presented at ACLP in San Diego, CA 2019;
LinkAbstractIntroduction: We present a patient who developed psychosis following correction of an encephalocele of the tegmen tympani, a thin aspect of the temporal bone separating the tympanic and cranial cavities. To our knowledge, there are no reports of psychosis following this surgery.
Case: At onset, BE was a 48-year-old Latina woman whose only psychiatric history had been depression and anxiety. She long struggled with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. She developed CSF otorrhea and underwent correction of an encephalocele, which involved a right temporal craniotomy. Within weeks, she experienced her first seizure, confirmed on EEG with right temporal slowing and spikes. She was prescribed levetiracetam and lamotrigine. Shortly thereafter, she developed persecutory delusions and tactile hallucinations. She was unsuccessfully treated in the community with olanzapine and psychotherapy. During an admission in 2017, her psychotic symptoms were found to have no EEG correlate. Levetiracetam was tapered with a plan to discontinue, and her illness responded to paliperidone. Unfortunately, levetiracetam was never tapered and she was prescribed olanzapine again in the community. She was ultimately referred to MGH psychiatry. In coordination with neurology, her levetiracetam was discontinued; lamotrigine was increased. She was prescribed risperidone, and after an admission due to nonadherence and underreporting symptoms, improved with medication, assisted by a visiting nurse.
Discussion: This case highlights the differential diagnosis of psychosis in a neurologically complex patient. This differential includes primary psychosis; substance-induced; psychoses associated with epilepsy (ictal, postictal, interictal psychoses); medication-induced; and psychosis from neurological injury. Given her age of onset and the prominence of tactile hallucinations, a primary psychotic disorder is unlikely. Stimulant-induced psychotic disorders, especially methamphetamine, are associated with paranoia and tactile hallucinations. However, there were no reports of substance use and her urine toxicologies were negative. Medication-induced psychosis, specifically levetiracetam, was a consideration, but her psychosis persisted months after discontinuation. Her psychotic symptoms do not occur in the ictal period nor in the days following, ruling out ictal and postictal psychoses. Interictal psychosis, a schizophrenia-like syndrome, occurs after years of controlled epilepsy. It is most likely that this illness resulted from neurosurgical injury. Supporting evidence for this hypothesis includes the temporal association with surgery and post-surgical MRI changes in right temporal lobe, lesions to which have resulted in psychosis in multiple case series in the literature. This case is also exemplary of Latinx values relevant to the therapeutic alliance, including respeto (deference to authority figures) and simpatia (preference for themes of positive valence).
Conclusion: The process of ruling out general medical conditions, medications, substances, and understanding the phenomenology of neuropsychiatric conditions is essential for treating such complex cases. An approach that favored interdisciplinary communication, appreciation of cultural values, and interventions beyond pharmacology resulted in a good clinical outcome.
Beckwith N, McDowell MJ, Reisner SL, Zaslow S, Weiss RD, Mayer KH, Keuroghlian AS.
Psychiatric Epidemiology of Transgender and Nonbinary Adult Patients at an Urban Health Center [Internet]. LGBT Health 2019;6(2):51-61.
LinkAbstractPurpose: Transgender and nonbinary people have an increased burden of psychiatric problems compared with the general population. Data are needed to understand factors associated with psychiatric diagnoses, acuity in terms of suicide attempts and level-of-care escalation, and outpatient engagement among transgender and nonbinary adults.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of records from 201 transgender and nonbinary adults who presented for primary care at a health center. Regression models were fit to examine factors associated with psychiatric diagnoses, substance use disorders (SUDs), acuity, and outpatient behavioral health engagement.
Results: Male sex assignment at birth was associated with decreased odds of a psychiatric diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20–0.81). Increased odds of SUDs were associated with later hormone initiation (OR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01–1.08) and suicide attempt (OR 5.79, 95% CI: 2.08–16.15). Increased odds of higher acuity were associated with alcohol use disorder (OR 31.54, 95% CI: 5.73–173.51), post-traumatic stress disorder (OR 18.14, 95% CI: 2.62–125.71), major depressive disorder (MDD) (OR 6.62, 95% CI: 1.72–25.44), and absence of psychiatrist integration into primary medical care (OR 4.52, 95% CI: 1.26–16.22). Increased odds of outpatient behavioral health engagement were associated with case management utilization (OR 10.73, 95% CI: 1.32–87.53), anxiety disorders (OR 15.84, 95% CI: 2.00–125.72), and MDD (OR 10.45, 95% CI: 2.28–47.98).
Conclusion: Psychiatric disorders were highly prevalent among transgender and nonbinary adult patients. Novel findings include associations of lack of psychiatrist integration into primary care with acuity and of case management utilization with outpatient behavioral health engagement.