@article {516091,
	title = {The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Composite Measure of Individual Surgeon Performance for Adult Cardiac Surgery: A Report of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Quality Measurement Task Force},
	journal = {Ann Thorac Surg},
	volume = {100},
	number = {4},
	year = {2015},
	month = {2015 Oct},
	pages = {1315-24; discussion 1324-5},
	abstract = {BACKGROUND: Previous composite performance measures of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) were estimated at the STS participant level, typically a hospital or group practice. The STS Quality Measurement Task Force has now developed a multiprocedural, multidimensional composite measure suitable for estimating the performance of individual surgeons.

METHODS: The development sample from the STS National Database included 621,489 isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, isolated aortic valve replacement, aortic valve replacement plus coronary artery bypass grafting, mitral, or mitral plus coronary artery bypass grafting procedures performed by 2,286 surgeons between July 1, 2011, and June 30, 2014. Each surgeon{\textquoteright}s composite score combined their aggregate risk-adjusted mortality and major morbidity rates (each weighted inversely by their standard deviations) and reflected the proportion of case types they performed. Model parameters were estimated in a Bayesian framework. Composite star ratings were examined using 90\%, 95\%, or 98\% Bayesian credible intervals. Measure reliability was estimated using various 3-year case thresholds.

RESULTS: The final composite measure was defined as 0.81 {\texttimes} (1 minus risk-standardized mortality rate) + 0.19 {\texttimes} (1 minus risk-standardized complication rate). Risk-adjusted mortality (median, 2.3\%; interquartile range, 1.7\% to 3.0\%), morbidity (median, 13.7\%; interquartile range, 10.8\% to 17.1\%), and composite scores (median, 95.4\%; interquartile range, 94.4\% to 96.3\%) varied substantially across surgeons. Using 98\% Bayesian credible intervals, there were 207 1-star (lower performance) surgeons (9.1\%), 1,701 2-star (as-expected performance) surgeons (74.4\%), and 378 3-star (higher performance) surgeons (16.5\%). With an eligibility threshold of 100 cases over 3 years, measure reliability was 0.81.

CONCLUSIONS: The STS has developed a multiprocedural composite measure suitable for evaluating performance at the individual surgeon level.},
	keywords = {Adult, Bayes Theorem, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Clinical Competence, Coronary Artery Bypass, Humans, Risk Adjustment, Societies, Medical},
	issn = {1552-6259},
	doi = {10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.06.122},
	author = {Shahian, David M and He, Xia and Jacobs, Jeffrey P and Kurlansky, Paul A and Badhwar, Vinay and Cleveland, Joseph C and Fazzalari, Frank L and Filardo, Giovanni and Normand, Sharon-Lise T. and Furnary, Anthony P and Magee, Mitchell J and Rankin, J Scott and Welke, Karl F and Han, Jane and O{\textquoteright}Brien, Sean M}
}
