slavovLab@galos_gann Another problem with such comments is that they can be obfuscated in convolute technical jargon, making them rather hard for professional editors to evaluate. They just make everybody's life harder for no good reason.
slavovLab@rmounce Perhaps the the questions over the credibility of #OA journals are raised my parties having selfish interests to undermine the march of #OA and preserve as long as possible the system that nourishes them.
slavovLab@galos_gann The point of peer review is constructive feedback, not highly-technical comments intended to confuse.
I raise this publicly because I think it's poisonous for the community. It's counterproductive. It's sad. It's pathetic.