Scientific Publications

2020
Max Friesen, Curtis R Warren, Haojie Yu, Takafumi Toyohara, Qiurong Ding, Mary HC Florido, Carolyn Sayre, Benjamin D Pope, Loyal A Goff, John L Rinn, and Chad A Cowan. 2020. “Mitoregulin Controls β-Oxidation in Human and Mouse Adipocytes.” Stem Cell Reports, 14, 4, Pp. 590-602.Abstract
We previously discovered in mouse adipocytes an lncRNA (the homolog of human LINC00116) regulating adipogenesis that contains a highly conserved coding region. Here, we show human protein expression of a peptide within LINC00116, and demonstrate that this peptide modulates triglyceride clearance in human adipocytes by regulating lipolysis and mitochondrial β-oxidation. This gene has previously been identified as mitoregulin (MTLN). We conclude that MTLN has a regulatory role in adipocyte metabolism as demonstrated by systemic lipid phenotypes in knockout mice. We also assert its adipocyte-autonomous phenotypes in both isolated murine adipocytes as well as human stem cell-derived adipocytes. MTLN directly interacts with the β subunit of the mitochondrial trifunctional protein, an enzyme critical in the β-oxidation of long-chain fatty acids. Our human and murine models contend that MTLN could be an avenue for further therapeutic research, albeit not without caveats, for example, by promoting white adipocyte triglyceride clearance in obese subjects.
2019
Aaron L Glieberman, Benjamin D Pope, John F Zimmerman, Qihan Liu, John P Ferrier, Jennifer HR Kenty, Adrian M Schrell, Nikita Mukhitov, Kevin L Shores, Adrian Buganza Tepole, Douglas A Melton, Michael G Roper, and Kevin Kit Parker. 2019. “Synchronized stimulation and continuous insulin sensing in a microfluidic human Islet on a Chip designed for scalable manufacturing.” Lab Chip, 19, 18, Pp. 2993-3010.Abstract
Pancreatic β cell function is compromised in diabetes and is typically assessed by measuring insulin secretion during glucose stimulation. Traditionally, measurement of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion involves manual liquid handling, heterogeneous stimulus delivery, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays that require large numbers of islets and processing time. Though microfluidic devices have been developed to address some of these limitations, traditional methods for islet testing remain the most common due to the learning curve for adopting microfluidic devices and the incompatibility of most device materials with large-scale manufacturing. We designed and built a thermoplastic, microfluidic-based Islet on a Chip compatible with commercial fabrication methods, that automates islet loading, stimulation, and insulin sensing. Inspired by the perfusion of native islets by designated arterioles and capillaries, the chip delivers synchronized glucose pulses to islets positioned in parallel channels. By flowing suspensions of human cadaveric islets onto the chip, we confirmed automatic capture of islets. Fluorescent glucose tracking demonstrated that stimulus delivery was synchronized within a two-minute window independent of the presence or size of captured islets. Insulin secretion was continuously sensed by an automated, on-chip immunoassay and quantified by fluorescence anisotropy. By integrating scalable manufacturing materials, on-line, continuous insulin measurement, and precise spatiotemporal stimulation into an easy-to-use design, the Islet on a Chip should accelerate efforts to study and develop effective treatments for diabetes.
2018
Christophe O Chantre, Patrick H Campbell, Holly M Golecki, Adrian T Buganza, Andrew K Capulli, Leila F Deravi, Stephanie Dauth, Sean P Sheehy, Jeffrey A Paten, Karl Gledhill, Yanne S Doucet, Hasan E Abaci, Seungkuk Ahn, Benjamin D Pope, Jeffrey W Ruberti, Simon P Hoerstrup, Angela M Christiano, and Kevin Kit Parker. 2018. “Production-scale fibronectin nanofibers promote wound closure and tissue repair in a dermal mouse model.” Biomaterials, 166, Pp. 96-108.Abstract
Wounds in the fetus can heal without scarring. Consequently, biomaterials that attempt to recapitulate the biophysical and biochemical properties of fetal skin have emerged as promising pro-regenerative strategies. The extracellular matrix (ECM) protein fibronectin (Fn) in particular is believed to play a crucial role in directing this regenerative phenotype. Accordingly, Fn has been implicated in numerous wound healing studies, yet remains untested in its fibrillar conformation as found in fetal skin. Here, we show that high extensional (∼1.2 ×10 s) and shear (∼3 ×10 s) strain rates in rotary jet spinning (RJS) can drive high throughput Fn fibrillogenesis (∼10 mL/min), thus producing nanofiber scaffolds that are used to effectively enhance wound healing. When tested on a full-thickness wound mouse model, Fn nanofiber dressings not only accelerated wound closure, but also significantly improved tissue restoration, recovering dermal and epidermal structures as well as skin appendages and adipose tissue. Together, these results suggest that bioprotein nanofiber fabrication via RJS could set a new paradigm for enhancing wound healing and may thus find use in a variety of regenerative medicine applications.
2016
Benjamin D Pope, Curtis R Warren, Kevin Kit Parker, and Chad A Cowan. 2016. “Microenvironmental Control of Adipocyte Fate and Function.” Trends Cell Biol, 26, 10, Pp. 745-755.Abstract
The properties of tissue-specific microenvironments vary widely in the human body and demonstrably influence the structure and function of many cell types. Adipocytes are no exception, responding to cues in specialized niches to perform vital metabolic and endocrine functions. The adipose microenvironment is remodeled during tissue expansion to maintain the structural and functional integrity of the tissue and disrupted remodeling in obesity contributes to the progression of metabolic syndrome, breast cancer, and other malignancies. The increasing incidence of these obesity-related diseases and the recent focus on improved in vitro models of human tissue biology underscore growing interest in the regulatory role of adipocyte microenvironments in health and disease.
2015
Molly R Gordon, Benjamin D Pope, Jiao Sima, and David M Gilbert. 2015. “Many paths lead chromatin to the nuclear periphery.” Bioessays, 37, 8, Pp. 862-6.Abstract
It is now well accepted that defined architectural compartments within the cell nucleus can regulate the transcriptional activity of chromosomal domains within their vicinity. However, it is generally unclear how these compartments are formed. The nuclear periphery has received a great deal of attention as a repressive compartment that is implicated in many cellular functions during development and disease. The inner nuclear membrane, the nuclear lamina, and associated proteins compose the nuclear periphery and together they interact with proximal chromatin creating a repressive environment. A new study by Harr et al. identifies specific protein-DNA interactions and epigenetic states necessary to re-position chromatin to the nuclear periphery in a cell-type specific manner. Here, we review concepts in gene positioning within the nucleus and current accepted models of dynamic gene repositioning within the nucleus during differentiation. This study highlights that myriad pathways lead to nuclear organization.
2014
Feng Yue, Yong Cheng, Alessandra Breschi, Jeff Vierstra, Weisheng Wu, Tyrone Ryba, Richard Sandstrom, Zhihai Ma, Carrie Davis, Benjamin D Pope, Yin Shen, Dmitri D Pervouchine, Sarah Djebali, Robert E Thurman, Rajinder Kaul, Eric Rynes, Anthony Kirilusha, Georgi K Marinov, Brian A Williams, Diane Trout, Henry Amrhein, Katherine Fisher-Aylor, Igor Antoshechkin, Gilberto DeSalvo, Lei-Hoon See, Meagan Fastuca, Jorg Drenkow, Chris Zaleski, Alex Dobin, Pablo Prieto, Julien Lagarde, Giovanni Bussotti, Andrea Tanzer, Olgert Denas, Kanwei Li, MA Bender, Miaohua Zhang, Rachel Byron, Mark T Groudine, David McCleary, Long Pham, Zhen Ye, Samantha Kuan, Lee Edsall, Yi-Chieh Wu, Matthew D Rasmussen, Mukul S Bansal, Manolis Kellis, Cheryl A Keller, Christapher S Morrissey, Tejaswini Mishra, Deepti Jain, Nergiz Dogan, Robert S Harris, Philip Cayting, Trupti Kawli, Alan P Boyle, Ghia Euskirchen, Anshul Kundaje, Shin Lin, Yiing Lin, Camden Jansen, Venkat S Malladi, Melissa S Cline, Drew T Erickson, Vanessa M Kirkup, Katrina Learned, Cricket A Sloan, Kate R Rosenbloom, Beatriz Lacerda de Sousa, Kathryn Beal, Miguel Pignatelli, Paul Flicek, Jin Lian, Tamer Kahveci, Dongwon Lee, James W Kent, Miguel Ramalho Santos, Javier Herrero, Cedric Notredame, Audra Johnson, Shinny Vong, Kristen Lee, Daniel Bates, Fidencio Neri, Morgan Diegel, Theresa Canfield, Peter J Sabo, Matthew S Wilken, Thomas A Reh, Erika Giste, Anthony Shafer, Tanya Kutyavin, Eric Haugen, Douglas Dunn, Alex P Reynolds, Shane Neph, Richard Humbert, Scott R Hansen, Marella De Bruijn, Licia Selleri, Alexander Rudensky, Steven Josefowicz, Robert Samstein, Evan E Eichler, Stuart H Orkin, Dana Levasseur, Thalia Papayannopoulou, Kai-Hsin Chang, Arthur Skoultchi, Srikanta Gosh, Christine Disteche, Piper Treuting, Yanli Wang, Mitchell J Weiss, Gerd A Blobel, Xiaoyi Cao, Sheng Zhong, Ting Wang, Peter J Good, Rebecca F Lowdon, Leslie B Adams, Xiao-Qiao Zhou, Michael J Pazin, Elise A Feingold, Barbara Wold, James Taylor, Ali Mortazavi, Sherman M Weissman, John A Stamatoyannopoulos, Michael P Snyder, Roderic Guigo, Thomas R Gingeras, David M Gilbert, Ross C Hardison, Michael A Beer, and Bing Ren. 2014. “A comparative encyclopedia of DNA elements in the mouse genome.” Nature, 515, 7527, Pp. 355-64.Abstract
The laboratory mouse shares the majority of its protein-coding genes with humans, making it the premier model organism in biomedical research, yet the two mammals differ in significant ways. To gain greater insights into both shared and species-specific transcriptional and cellular regulatory programs in the mouse, the Mouse ENCODE Consortium has mapped transcription, DNase I hypersensitivity, transcription factor binding, chromatin modifications and replication domains throughout the mouse genome in diverse cell and tissue types. By comparing with the human genome, we not only confirm substantial conservation in the newly annotated potential functional sequences, but also find a large degree of divergence of sequences involved in transcriptional regulation, chromatin state and higher order chromatin organization. Our results illuminate the wide range of evolutionary forces acting on genes and their regulatory regions, and provide a general resource for research into mammalian biology and mechanisms of human diseases.
Benjamin D Pope and David M Gilbert. 2014. “Genetics: Up and down in Down's syndrome.” Nature, 508, 7496, Pp. 323-4.
Benjamin D Pope, Tyrone Ryba, Vishnu Dileep, Feng Yue, Weisheng Wu, Olgert Denas, Daniel L Vera, Yanli Wang, Scott R Hansen, Theresa K Canfield, Robert E Thurman, Yong Cheng, Günhan Gülsoy, Jonathan H Dennis, Michael P Snyder, John A Stamatoyannopoulos, James Taylor, Ross C Hardison, Tamer Kahveci, Bing Ren, and David M Gilbert. 2014. “Topologically associating domains are stable units of replication-timing regulation.” Nature, 515, 7527, Pp. 402-5.Abstract
Eukaryotic chromosomes replicate in a temporal order known as the replication-timing program. In mammals, replication timing is cell-type-specific with at least half the genome switching replication timing during development, primarily in units of 400-800 kilobases ('replication domains'), whose positions are preserved in different cell types, conserved between species, and appear to confine long-range effects of chromosome rearrangements. Early and late replication correlate, respectively, with open and closed three-dimensional chromatin compartments identified by high-resolution chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C), and, to a lesser extent, late replication correlates with lamina-associated domains (LADs). Recent Hi-C mapping has unveiled substructure within chromatin compartments called topologically associating domains (TADs) that are largely conserved in their positions between cell types and are similar in size to replication domains. However, TADs can be further sub-stratified into smaller domains, challenging the significance of structures at any particular scale. Moreover, attempts to reconcile TADs and LADs to replication-timing data have not revealed a common, underlying domain structure. Here we localize boundaries of replication domains to the early-replicating border of replication-timing transitions and map their positions in 18 human and 13 mouse cell types. We demonstrate that, collectively, replication domain boundaries share a near one-to-one correlation with TAD boundaries, whereas within a cell type, adjacent TADs that replicate at similar times obscure replication domain boundaries, largely accounting for the previously reported lack of alignment. Moreover, cell-type-specific replication timing of TADs partitions the genome into two large-scale sub-nuclear compartments revealing that replication-timing transitions are indistinguishable from late-replicating regions in chromatin composition and lamina association and accounting for the reduced correlation of replication timing to LADs and heterochromatin. Our results reconcile cell-type-specific sub-nuclear compartmentalization and replication timing with developmentally stable structural domains and offer a unified model for large-scale chromosome structure and function.
2013
Benjamin D Pope and David M Gilbert. 2013. “The replication domain model: regulating replicon firing in the context of large-scale chromosome architecture.” J Mol Biol, 425, 23, Pp. 4690-5.Abstract
The "Replicon Theory" of Jacob, Brenner, and Cuzin has reliably served as the paradigm for regulating the sites where individual replicons initiate replication. Concurrent with the replicon model was Taylor's demonstration that plant and animal chromosomes replicate segmentally in a defined temporal sequence, via cytologically defined units too large to be accounted for by a single replicon. Instead, there seemed to be a program to choreograph when chromosome units replicate during S phase, executed by initiation at clusters of individual replicons within each segment. Here, we summarize recent molecular evidence for the existence of such units, now known as "replication domains", and discuss how the organization of large chromosomes into structural units has added additional layers of regulation to the original replicon model.
Benjamin D Pope, Oscar M Aparicio, and David M Gilbert. 2013. “SnapShot: Replication timing.” Cell, 152, 6, Pp. 1390-1390.e1.
2012
Tyrone Ryba, Dana Battaglia, Bill H Chang, James W Shirley, Quinton Buckley, Benjamin D Pope, Meenakshi Devidas, Brian J Druker, and David M Gilbert. 2012. “Abnormal developmental control of replication-timing domains in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.” Genome Res, 22, 10, Pp. 1833-44.Abstract
Abnormal replication timing has been observed in cancer but no study has comprehensively evaluated this misregulation. We generated genome-wide replication-timing profiles for pediatric leukemias from 17 patients and three cell lines, as well as normal B and T cells. Nonleukemic EBV-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines displayed highly stable replication-timing profiles that were more similar to normal T cells than to leukemias. Leukemias were more similar to each other than to B and T cells but were considerably more heterogeneous than nonleukemic controls. Some differences were patient specific, while others were found in all leukemic samples, potentially representing early epigenetic events. Differences encompassed large segments of chromosomes and included genes implicated in other types of cancer. Remarkably, differences that distinguished leukemias aligned in register to the boundaries of developmentally regulated replication-timing domains that distinguish normal cell types. Most changes did not coincide with copy-number variation or translocations. However, many of the changes that were associated with translocations in some leukemias were also shared between all leukemic samples independent of the genetic lesion, suggesting that they precede and possibly predispose chromosomes to the translocation. Altogether, our results identify sites of abnormal developmental control of DNA replication in cancer that reveal the significance of replication-timing boundaries to chromosome structure and function and support the replication domain model of replication-timing regulation. They also open new avenues of investigation into the chromosomal basis of cancer and provide a potential novel source of epigenetic cancer biomarkers.
Tamir Chandra, Kristina Kirschner, Jean-Yves Thuret, Benjamin D Pope, Tyrone Ryba, Scott Newman, Kashif Ahmed, Shamith A Samarajiwa, Rafik Salama, Thomas Carroll, Rory Stark, Rekin's Janky, Masako Narita, Lixiang Xue, Agustin Chicas, Sabrina Nũnez, Ralf Janknecht, Yoko Hayashi-Takanaka, Michael D Wilson, Aileen Marshall, Duncan T Odom, Madan M Babu, David P Bazett-Jones, Simon Tavaré, Paul AW Edwards, Scott W Lowe, Hiroshi Kimura, David M Gilbert, and Masashi Narita. 2012. “Independence of repressive histone marks and chromatin compaction during senescent heterochromatic layer formation.” Mol Cell, 47, 2, Pp. 203-14.Abstract
The expansion of repressive epigenetic marks has been implicated in heterochromatin formation during embryonic development, but the general applicability of this mechanism is unclear. Here we show that nuclear rearrangement of repressive histone marks H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 into nonoverlapping structural layers characterizes senescence-associated heterochromatic foci (SAHF) formation in human fibroblasts. However, the global landscape of these repressive marks remains unchanged upon SAHF formation, suggesting that in somatic cells, heterochromatin can be formed through the spatial repositioning of pre-existing repressively marked histones. This model is reinforced by the correlation of presenescent replication timing with both the subsequent layered structure of SAHFs and the global landscape of the repressive marks, allowing us to integrate microscopic and genomic information. Furthermore, modulation of SAHF structure does not affect the occupancy of these repressive marks, nor vice versa. These experiments reveal that high-order heterochromatin formation and epigenetic remodeling of the genome can be discrete events.
Benjamin D Pope, Tamir Chandra, Quinton Buckley, Matthew Hoare, Tyrone Ryba, Frances K Wiseman, Anna Kuta, Michael D Wilson, Duncan T Odom, and David M Gilbert. 2012. “Replication-timing boundaries facilitate cell-type and species-specific regulation of a rearranged human chromosome in mouse.” Hum Mol Genet, 21, 19, Pp. 4162-70.Abstract
In multicellular organisms, developmental changes to replication timing occur in 400-800 kb domains across half the genome. While examples of epigenetic control of replication timing have been described, a role for DNA sequence in mammalian replication-timing regulation has not been substantiated. To assess the role of DNA sequences in directing developmental changes to replication timing, we profiled replication timing in mice carrying a genetically rearranged Human Chromosome 21 (Hsa21). In two distinct mouse cell types, Hsa21 sequences maintained human-specific replication timing, except at points of Hsa21 rearrangement. Changes in replication timing at rearrangements extended up to 900 kb and consistently reconciled with the wild-type replication pattern at developmental boundaries of replication-timing domains. Our results are consistent with DNA sequence-driven regulation of Hsa21 replication timing during development and provide evidence that mammalian chromosomes consist of multiple independent units of replication-timing regulation.
2011
Benjamin D Pope, Koji Tsumagari, Dana Battaglia, Tyrone Ryba, Ichiro Hiratani, Melanie Ehrlich, and David M Gilbert. 2011. “DNA replication timing is maintained genome-wide in primary human myoblasts independent of D4Z4 contraction in FSH muscular dystrophy.” PLoS One, 6, 11, Pp. e27413.Abstract
Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is linked to contraction of an array of tandem 3.3-kb repeats (D4Z4) at 4q35.2 from 11-100 copies to 1-10 copies. The extent to which D4Z4 contraction at 4q35.2 affects overall 4q35.2 chromatin organization remains unclear. Because DNA replication timing is highly predictive of long-range chromatin interactions, we generated genome-wide replication-timing profiles for FSHD and control myogenic precursor cells. We compared non-immortalized myoblasts from four FSHD patients and three control individuals to each other and to a variety of other human cell types. This study also represents the first genome-wide comparison of replication timing profiles in non-immortalized human cell cultures. Myoblasts from both control and FSHD individuals all shared a myoblast-specific replication profile. In contrast, male and female individuals were readily distinguished by monoallelic differences in replication timing at DXZ4 and other regions across the X chromosome affected by X inactivation. We conclude that replication timing is a robust cell-type specific feature that is unaffected by FSHD-related D4Z4 contraction.
Tyrone Ryba, Dana Battaglia, Benjamin D Pope, Ichiro Hiratani, and David M Gilbert. 2011. “Genome-scale analysis of replication timing: from bench to bioinformatics.” Nat Protoc, 6, 6, Pp. 870-95.Abstract
Replication timing profiles are cell type-specific and reflect genome organization changes during differentiation. In this protocol, we describe how to analyze genome-wide replication timing (RT) in mammalian cells. Asynchronously cycling cells are pulse labeled with the nucleotide analog 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU) and sorted into S-phase fractions on the basis of DNA content using flow cytometry. BrdU-labeled DNA from each fraction is immunoprecipitated, amplified, differentially labeled and co-hybridized to a whole-genome comparative genomic hybridization microarray, which is currently more cost effective than high-throughput sequencing and equally capable of resolving features at the biologically relevant level of tens to hundreds of kilobases. We also present a guide to analyzing the resulting data sets based on methods we use routinely. Subjects include normalization, scaling and data quality measures, LOESS (local polynomial) smoothing of RT values, segmentation of data into domains and assignment of timing values to gene promoters. Finally, we cover clustering methods and means to relate changes in the replication program to gene expression and other genetic and epigenetic data sets. Some experience with R or similar programming languages is assumed. All together, the protocol takes ∼3 weeks per batch of samples.
2010
Benjamin D Pope, Ichiro Hiratani, and David M Gilbert. 2010. “Domain-wide regulation of DNA replication timing during mammalian development.” Chromosome Res, 18, 1, Pp. 127-36.Abstract
Studies of replication timing provide a handle into previously impenetrable higher-order levels of chromosome organization and their plasticity during development. Although mechanisms regulating replication timing are not clear, novel genome-wide studies provide a thorough survey of the extent to which replication timing is regulated during most of the early cell fate transitions in mammals, revealing coordinated changes of a defined set of 400-800 kb chromosomal segments that involve at least half the genome. Furthermore, changes in replication time are linked to changes in sub-nuclear organization and domain-wide transcriptional potential, and tissue-specific replication timing profiles are conserved from mouse to human, suggesting that the program has developmental significance. Hence, these studies have provided a solid foundation for linking megabase level chromosome structure to function, and suggest a central role for replication in domain-level genome organization.
DM Gilbert, S-I Takebayashi, T Ryba, J Lu, BD Pope, KA Wilson, and I Hiratani. 2010. “Space and time in the nucleus: developmental control of replication timing and chromosome architecture.” Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, 75, Pp. 143-53.Abstract
All eukaryotic cells replicate segments of their genomes in a defined temporal sequence. In multicellular organisms, at least half of the genome is subject to changes in this temporal sequence during development. We now know that this temporal sequence and its developmentally regulated changes are conserved across distantly related species, suggesting that it either represents or reflects something biologically important. However, both the mechanism and the significance of this program remain unknown. We recently demonstrated a remarkably strong genome-wide correlation between replication timing and chromatin interaction maps, stronger than any other chromosomal property analyzed to date, indicating that sequences localized close to one another replicate at similar times. This provides molecular confirmation of long-standing cytogenetic evidence for spatial compartmentalization of early- and late-replicating DNA and supports our earlier model that replication timing is reestablished in each G(1) phase, coincident with the anchorage of chromosomal segments at specific locations within the nucleus (timing decision point [TDP]). Here, we review the evidence linking the replication program to the three-dimensional architecture of chromatin in the nucleus and discuss what such a link might mean for the mechanism and significance of a developmentally regulated replication program.