Multilateral Negotiations for Rescheduling Developing Country Debt: A Bargaining-Theoretic Framework

Citation:

Bulow, Jeremy, and Kenneth Rogoff. 1988. “Multilateral Negotiations for Rescheduling Developing Country Debt: A Bargaining-Theoretic Framework.” International Monetary Fund Staff Papers 35: 644–657.
Article886 KB

Abstract:

A dynamic bargaining-theoretic framework is used to analyze multilateral negotiations for rescheduling sovereign debt. The analysis illustrates how various factors, such as the debtor's gains from trade and the level of the world interest rates, affect the relative bargaining power of various parties to a rescheduling agreement. If creditor-country taxpayers have a vested interest in maintaining normal levels of trade with debtor countries, then they can sometimes be bargained into making sidepayments. The benefits from unanticipated creditor-country sidepayments accrue to both lenders and borrowers. But the benefits from perfectly anticipated sidepayments accrue entirely to borrowers.

Notes:

Reprinted in Jacob A. Frenkel, Michael P. Dooley and Peter Wickham, eds., Analytical Issues in Debt, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC, 1989.

Last updated on 04/29/2013