@article {607470,
	title = {Translating Causal Claims: Principles and Strategies for Policy-Relevant Criminology},
	journal = {Criminology and Public Policy},
	volume = {12},
	number = {4},
	year = {2013},
	pages = {585-616},
	abstract = {This article reviews the causal turn in the social sciences and accompanying efforts by criminologists to make policy claims more credible. Although there has been much progress in techniques for the estimation of causal effects, we find that the link between evidence and valid policy implications remains elusive. Drawing on criminological theory and research insights from disciplines such as sociology, economics, and statistics, we assess principles and strategies for informing policy in a causally uncertain world. We identify three distinct domains of inquiry that form a part of the translational process from evidence to policy and that complicate the straightforward exportation of causal effects to policy recommendations: (a) mechanisms and causal pathways, (b) effect heterogeneity, and (c) contextualization. We elaborate these three concepts by examining research on broken windows theory, policing, video games and violence, the Moving to Opportunity voucher experiment, incarceration, and especially the rich set of experimental studies on domestic violence that originated in Minneapolis, MN in the early 1980s. We also articulate a set of conceptual tools for advancing the goal of policy translation and offer recommendations for how what we call {\textquotedblleft}policy graphs{\textquotedblright}{\textemdash}causal graphs used to analyze the policy implications of a system of causal relations{\textemdash}can potentially integrate the theoretical and policy arms of criminology.},
	url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1745-9133.12028},
	author = {Robert J. Sampson and Christopher Winship and Carly Knight}
}
