@article {664168,
	title = {When is Staying Home Partisan? Policy Conflict and Precaution-Taking during a Pandemic},
	journal = {Perspectives on Politics},
	year = {Submitted},
	author = {Seth Soderborg and Burhan Muhtadi}
}
@inbook {655050,
	title = {Electoral Manipulation in Indonesia: From Structured, Systematic, and Massive to Sporadic, Isolated, and Minor},
	booktitle = {Electoral Manipulation in East and Southeast Asia},
	year = {Forthcoming},
	publisher = {Lynne Riener},
	organization = {Lynne Riener},
	author = {Seth Soderborg},
	editor = {Netina Tan and Kharis Templeman}
}
@webarticle {667494,
	title = {Keberpihakan politik berpengaruh pada perilaku masyarakat terhadap pandemi di wilayah yang konflik politiknya tinggi (Jakarta misalnya)},
	journal = {The Conversation},
	year = {2020},
	url = {https://theconversation.com/riset-keberpihakan-politik-berpengaruh-pada-perilaku-masyarakat-terhadap-pandemi-di-wilayah-yang-konflik-politiknya-tinggi-jakarta-misalnya-150877},
	author = {Seth Soderborg and Burhanuddin Muhtadi}
}
@report {655179,
	title = {Policy, Partisanship, and Pay: Diverging COVID-19 Responses in Indonesia},
	year = {2020},
	url = {https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3636486},
	author = {Seth Soderborg and Burhanuddin Muhtadi}
}
@webarticle {655180,
	title = {Indonesia: how the polls are performing},
	journal = {New Mandala},
	number = {15 Apr 2019},
	year = {2019},
	url = {https://www.newmandala.org/indonesia-how-the-polls-are-performing/},
	author = {Seth Soderborg}
}
@report {655053,
	title = {Steady Polls, No Incumbent Apocalypse, and Prabowo{\textquoteright}s Young Base: What Will Happen in Indonesia{\textquoteright}s 2019 Election, March 2019 Update},
	year = {2019},
	institution = {Centre for Strategic and International Studies},
	address = {Jakarta},
	author = {Seth Soderborg}
}
@report {655051,
	title = {What Will Happen in Indonesia{\textquoteright}s 2019 Legislative Election?},
	year = {2018},
	institution = {Harvard University},
	address = {Cambridge},
	author = {Seth Soderborg}
}
@conference {254016,
	title = {Volunteer Spies, Volunteer Bureaucrats: Neighborhood Governance in Indonesia and Around the World},
	booktitle = {Midwest Political Science Association 2015 Conference},
	year = {2015},
	month = {18 Apr},
	address = {Chicago, IL},
	abstract = {In many\&nbsp;developing\&nbsp;countries,\&nbsp;auxiliaries of the formal civil service are organized at the level of a handful of households to carry out administrative tasks. This institutional form is especially common\&nbsp;in, but not limited to, Pacific Asia, where it is\&nbsp;a\&nbsp;legacy of Japanese colonialism. Neighborhood governance\&nbsp;of this kind\&nbsp;is a top-down project designed to direct organizational life to state purposes.\&nbsp;When effective, these systems provide cheap labor to the state,\&nbsp;supplementing\&nbsp;small civil services and security forces\&nbsp;with organized volunteers.\&nbsp;These systems originated in periods of non-democratic rule, but in a number of countries, have continued to function long after democratization.\&nbsp;It is not clear, however, why residents choose to provide this labor in a democratic context.\&nbsp;With evidence from\&nbsp;Indonesia, I find evidence suggesting that the effectiveness of the neighborhood governance system depends on\&nbsp;residents{\textquoteright}\&nbsp;incentives to participate, and that these are\&nbsp;related to\&nbsp;individual characteristics, including age, and community characteristics like residential mobility. I then outline designs for testing\&nbsp;the effects of these characteristics on participation in neighborhood governance, and the effects of neighborhood leadership density on political participation and disaster recovery.\&nbsp;},
	author = {Seth Nathan Soderborg}
}
@mastersthesis {85071,
	title = {How Social Policy and Scandal Transformed Brazil{\textquoteright}s Partido dos Trabalhadores},
	year = {2012},
	type = {B.A. Thesis},
	abstract = {This paper analyzes evidence that the PT{\textquoteright}s electoral base has changed over time, posits that the 
Bolsa Fam{\'\i}lia social welfare program and a 2005 corruption scandal worked together to 
produce the shift, if it happened, and uses municipal-level data to test a model of voter support 
for PT candidates in congressional races. It also considers whether the Bolsa program is subject 
to clientelistic interference. Results suggest that the Bolsa program does increase voter support 
for the PT at the municipal level, and that this effect has grown larger as the average benefit 
payment has increased. The provision of conditional benefits to Brazil{\textquoteright}s poorest citizens has 
firmly entrenched a pro-poor discourse likely to remain the norm for the foreseeable future. },
	url = {http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/91783},
	author = {Soderborg, Seth N}
}
