@article {673515,
	title = {The future of sperm: A biovariability framework for understanding global sperm count trends},
	journal = {Human Fertility},
	volume = {DOI 10.1080/14647273.2021.1917778},
	year = {2021},
	abstract = {The past 50 years have seen heated debate in the reproductive sciences about global trends in human sperm count. In 2017, Levine and colleagues published the most methodologically rigorous and largest meta-regression analysis to date and reported that average total sperm concentration among men from {\textquotedblleft}Western{\textquotedblright} countries has decreased by 59.3\% since 1973, with no sign of halting. These results reverberated in the scientific community and in public discussions about men and masculinity in the modern world, in part because of scientists{\textquoteright} public-facing claims about the societal implications of the decline of male fertility. We find that existing research follows a set of implicit and explicit assumptions about how to measure and interpret sperm counts, which collectively form what we term the Sperm Count Decline hypothesis (SCD). Using the study by Levine and colleagues, we identify weaknesses and inconsistencies in the SCD, and propose an alternative framework to guide research on sperm count trends, the Sperm Count Biovariability hypothesis (SCB). SCB asserts that sperm count varies within a wide range, much of which can be considered non-pathological and species-typical. Knowledge about the relationship between individual and population sperm count and life-historical and ecological factors is critical to interpreting trends in average sperm counts and their relationships to health and fertility.},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2021.1917778},
	author = {Marion Boulicault and Meg Perret and Jonathan Galka and Alex Borsa and Annika Gompers and Reiches, Meredith and Sarah S. Richardson}
}
