@booklet {stavins_options_2010, title = {Options for the Institutional Venue for International Climate Negotiations}, year = {2010}, note = {F-26}, publisher = {Harvard Project on Climate Agreements}, type = {Issue Brief}, address = {Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA}, abstract = {It is exceptionally challenging to conclude a comprehensive and effective multilateral agreement to address global climate change among nations with divergent interests. This is true for many international issues. However, largely because any domestic policy or set of policies to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (whether intended to implement an international agreement or not) extend so deeply into the economic fabric of a nation, climate change negotiations have proven to be exceptionally difficult. The Fifteenth Conference of the Parties (COP-15) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) reinforced doubts about whether the UNFCCC should continue to be the primary institutional venue for global climate change negotiations. This issue brief assesses some other institutions that might serve to supplement or partially replace the UNFCCC.}, keywords = {Grey literature, IPCCAR5, not for distribution, UNFCCC}, url = {http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/20132}, author = {Robert N. Stavins} }