@article {schatzki_transitioning_2019,
	title = {Transitioning to Long-Run Effective and Efficient Climate Policies},
	journal = {Discussion Paper},
	year = {2019},
	note = {[F-40]},
	author = {Schatzki, Todd and Scott, R. and Stavins, R. N.}
}
@booklet {schatzki_ghg_2018,
	title = {GHG Cap-and-Trade: Implications for Effective and Efficient Climate Policy in Oregon},
	number = {DP\_92},
	year = {2018},
	publisher = {Harvard Environmental Economics Program},
	type = {Discussion Paper},
	author = {Schatzki, Todd and Robert Stavins}
}
@booklet {stavins_free_2008,
	title = {Free Greenhouse Gas Cuts: Too Good to Be True?},
	journal = {VoxEU.org},
	year = {2008},
	note = {D-57},
	month = {jan},
	abstract = {The possibility of {\textquotedblleft}no cost{\textquotedblright} emission reductions has been raised by research on California{\textquoteright}s Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. Here is a more sober assessment. Overly optimistic findings leave policymakers with inadequate appreciation of the stakes, and provide little insight into the relative cost of policy design alternatives.},
	url = {http://www.voxeu.org/article/free-greenhouse-gas-cuts-too-good-be-true},
	author = {Robert N. Stavins and Jaffe, Judson and Schatzki, Todd}
}
@booklet {stavins_too_2007,
	title = {Too good to be true? An examination of three economic assessments of California climate change policy},
	year = {2007},
	note = {F-19},
	month = {jan},
	publisher = {National Bureau of Economic Research},
	url = {http://www.nber.org/papers/w13587},
	author = {Robert Stavins and Jaffe, Judson and Schatzki, Todd}
}
