Publications

2012
Stavins, Robert N. “An Unambiguous Consequence of the Durban Climate Talks.” Review of Environment, Energy, and Economics (2012): 1-4. Publisher's VersionAbstract

One of the major outcomes of the Durban Climate Conference in 2011 was the 'Durban Platform for Enhanced Action' - a non-binding agreement to forge a new treaty by 2015 that will bring all countries under the same legal regime by 2020. This article will explain why the 'Durban Platform for Enhanced Action' has opened an important window in climate talks.

stavins_rev_env_energy_econ_march_2012.pdf

A-69

Aldy, Joseph E, and Robert N Stavins. “Using the Market to Address Climate Change: Insights from Theory & Experience.” Daedalus 141 (2012): 45–60. Publisher's VersionAbstract

Emissions of greenhouse gases linked with global climate change are affected by diverse aspects of economic activity, including individual consumption, business investment, and government spending. An effective climate policy will have to modify the decision calculus for these activities in the direction of more efficient generation and use of energy, lower carbon-intensity of energy, and a more carbon-lean economy. The only technically feasible and cost-effective approach to achieving this goal on a meaningful scale is carbon pricing: that is, market-based climate policies that place a shadow-price on carbon dioxide emissions. We examine alternative designs of three such instruments: carbon taxes, cap and trade, and clean energy standards. We note that the U.S. political response to possible market-based approaches to climate policy has been, and will continue to be, largely a function of issues and structural factors that transcend the scope of environmental and climate policy.

aldy_and_stavins_daedalus.pdf

A-70

2011
Stavins, Robert N. “Cancun Produces Meaningful Steps.” The Environmental Forum 28 (2011): 16. column_41.pdf

D-90

Stavins, Robert N. “A Century of Progress, Problems.(environmental Economics).” The Environmental Forum 28 (2011): 16. column_43.pdf

D-92

Goulder, Lawrence H, and Robert N Stavins. “Challenges from State-Federal Interactions in Us Climate Change Policy.” American Economic Review 101 (2011): 253–257. Publisher's Version goulderstavinsaerpapersproceedings.pdf

A-66

Stavins, Robert N. “Curbing Carbon.” Technology Review (2011): 10. stavins_technology_review_march-april_2011.pdf

D-89

Stavins, Robert N. “Does Less and Costs More. (disadvantages of Renewable Electricity/Clean Energy Standards Over a Comprehensive Cap-and-Trade Approach to Reducing CO2 Emissions).” The Environmental Forum 28 (2011): 16. column_42.pdf

D-91

Hahn, Robert W, and Robert N Stavins. “The Effect of Allowance Allocations on Cap-and-Trade System Performance.” Journal of Law and Economics 54 (2011): S267–S294. Publisher's VersionAbstract

Abstract An implication of the Coase theorem is that under certain conditions, the market equilibrium in a cap-and-trade system will be cost-effective and independent of the initial allocation of tradable rights. That is, the overall cost of achieving a given aggregate emission reduction will be minimized, and the final allocation of permits will be independent of the initial allocation. We call this the independence property. This property is important because it means that the government can establish the overall pollution reduction goal for a cap-and-trade system by setting the cap and leaving it up to the legislature to construct a constituency in support of the program by allocating the allowances to various interests without affecting either the environmental performance of the system or its aggregate social costs. We examine the conditions under which the independence property is likely to hold—both in theory and in practice.

hahn_stavins_in_journal_of_law_economics.pdf

A-73

Stavins, Robert N. “Good News from Regulatory Front.” The Environmental Forum 28 (2011): 16. column_44.pdf

D-93

Stavins, Robert N. “The National Context of U.S. State Policies for a Global Commons Problem.” Roskilde, Denmark: United Nations Environment Program, 2011. stavins_perspectives_durban_2011.pdf

D-95

Stavins, Robert N. “Polarized Politics, Paralyzed Policy.” The Environmental Forum 28 (2011): 18. column_45.pdf

D-94

Stavins, Robert N. “The Problem of the Commons: Still Unsettled After 100 Years.” American Economic Review 101 (2011): 81–108. Publisher's Version aer_final_version_stavins_feb_2011.pdf

A-63

Stavins, Robert N. “Qué sucedió (y por qué)? (What happened and why? An assessment of the Cancun agreements).” Foreign Affairs Latinoamérica 11 (2011): 42–49. Publisher's Version stavins_article_foreign_affairs_march_2011.pdf

A-64

Stavins, Robert N. “Repairing the R&D market failure.” The Environmental Forum 28 (2011): 16. column_40.pdf

D-88

Cross, Robin, Andrew J Plantinga, and Robert N Stavins. “The Value of Terroir: Hedonic Estimation of Vineyard Sale Prices.” Journal of Wine Economics 6 (2011): 1–14. 6_wineeconomics_vol_6_1_cross_plantinga_stavins.pdf

A-67

Stavins, Robert N. “A Wave of the Future: International Linkage of Carbon Markets.” Outreach: A Multi-stakeholder Magazine on Environment and Sustainable Development (2011): 4–5. Publisher's Version stavins_outreach_december_2011.pdf

D-96

Cross, Robin, Andrew J Plantinga, and Robert N Stavins. “What Is the Value of Terroir?The American Economic Review 101 (2011): 152–156. Publisher's Version crossplantingastavinsaerpapersproceedings.pdf

A-65

2010
Schmalensee, Richard, and Robert Stavins. “The Power of Cap-and- Trade.” Boston.com (2010). Publisher's Version
D-80
Stavins, Robert N, and Richard Schmalensee. “Renewable Irony.” The Huffington Post, 2010. Publisher's VersionAbstract
Those who believe that renewable electricity standards would create a huge number of green jobs have forgotten the lesson of Detroit: a large domestic market does not guarantee a healthy domestic industry.
D-85
Stavins, Robert N. “Why Cancun Trumped Copenhagen: Warmer Relations on Rising Temperatures.” Christian Science Monitor (2010). Publisher's VersionAbstract
The climate change talks in Cancun, Mexico, didn’t solve all the world’s climate problems. But they were hugely successful. Through the Cancun Agreements, 194 countries reached landmark consensus (even the US and China) to set emissions targets and limit global temperature increases.
D-87

Pages