C-29
Search
Search results
. “Environmental Economics.” In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, . 2nd ed. Basingstoke, Hampshire ; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
. “A Meaningful Second Commitment Period for the Kyoto Protocol.” In The Economists' Voice: Top Economists Take on Today's Problems, , 28–36. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008.Abstract
C-28
. “An International Policy Architecture for the Post-Kyoto Era.” In Global Warming: Looking Beyond Kyoto, , 145–153. Washington, D.C. Brookings Institution Press, 2008.Abstract
C-27
. “Market-Based Environmental Policies: What Can We Learn From U.S. Experience (and Related Research)?” In Moving to Markets in Environmental Regulation: Lessons from Twenty Years of Experience, , 19–47. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.Abstract
C-26
. “Environmental Law.” In Handbook of Law and Economics, , 1:499–589. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 2007.Abstract
C-25
. “Implications of the U.S. Experience with Market-Based Environment Strategies for Future Climate Policy.” In Emissions Trading for Climate Policy: US and European Perspectives, , 63–77. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Abstract
C-24
. “Environmental Protection and Economic Well-Being: How Does (and How Should) Government Balance These Two Important Values?” In Tackling the Critical Conundrum: How Do Business, Government and Media Balance Economic Growth and a Healthy Environment? , 43–56. Washington, D.C. The Aspen Institute, 2004.
C-23
. “Introduction.” In The Political Economy of Environmental Regulation. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, Mass: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc. 2004.
C-22
. “Technology Policy for Energy and the Environment.” In Innovation Policy and the Economy, , 4:35–68. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research, 2004.
C-20
“Lessons from the American Experiment with Market-Based Environmental Policies.” In Market-Based Governance: Supply Side, Demand Side, Upside, and Downside, 173–200. Washington D.C. The Brookings Institution, 2002.
C-17