Rethinking Priorities: Cost of Complications After Elective Colectomy

Citation:

Zogg, C. K., P. Najjar, A. J. Diaz, D. L. Zogg, T. C. Tsai, Jr. Rose, J. A., J. W. Scott, et al. 2016. “Rethinking Priorities: Cost of Complications After Elective Colectomy.” Ann SurgAnn Surg 264: 312-22.

Date Published:

Aug

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To compare incremental costs associated with complications of elective colectomy using nationally representative data among patients undergoing laparoscopic/open resections for the 4 most frequent diagnoses. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Rising healthcare costs have led to increasing focus on the need to achieve a better understanding of the association between costs and quality. Among elective colectomies, a focus of surgical quality-improvement initiatives, interpretable evidence to support existing approaches is lacking. METHODS: The 2009 to 2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) data were queried for adult (>/=18 years) patients undergoing elective colectomy. Patients with primary diagnoses for colon cancer, diverticular disease, benign colonic neoplasm, and ulcerative colitis/regional enteritis were included. Based on system-based complications considered relevant to long-term treatment of elective colectomy, stratified differences in risk-adjusted incremental hospital costs and complications probabilities were compared. RESULTS: A total of 68,462 patients were included, weighted to represent 337,887 patients nationwide. A total of 16.4% experienced complications. Annual risk-adjusted incremental costs amounted to >$150 million. Magnitudes of complication prevalences/costs varied by primary diagnosis, operative technique, and complication group. Infectious complications contributed the most ($55 million), followed by gastrointestinal ($53 million), pulmonary ($22 million), and cardiovascular ($11 million) complications. Total annual costs for elective colectomies amounted to >$1.7 billion: 11.3% was due to complications [1.9% due to current Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) complications]. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight a need to consider the varied/broad impact of complications, offering a stratified paradigm for priority setting in surgery. As we move forward in the development of novel/adaptation of existing interventions, it will be essential to weigh the cost of complications in an evidence-based way.

Notes:

Zogg, Cheryl KNajjar, PeterDiaz, Arturo J RiosZogg, Donald LTsai, Thomas CRose, John A JrScott, John WGani, FaizAlshaikh, HusainCanner, Joseph KSchneider, Eric BGoldberg, Joel EHaider, Adil Heng2015/10/27 06:00Ann Surg. 2016 Aug;264(2):312-22. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001511.