@inbook {663199,
	title = {An Application of the RTM Framework to UnderstandPrimary Health Care in Nigeria},
	booktitle = {Tracking Resources for Primary Health Care: A Framework and Practices in Low- and Middle-Income Countries},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2020},
	publisher = {World Scientific},
	organization = {World Scientific},
	author = {Kress, Daniel H and Hong Wang and Su, Yanfang}
}
@inbook {663198,
	title = {Productivity of Health Workers in Primary HealthcareFacilities in Nigeria: Why is the Average CaseloadEstimated to be Low?},
	booktitle = {Tracking Resources for Primary Health Care: A Framework and Practices in Low- and Middle-Income Countries},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2020},
	publisher = {World Scientific},
	organization = {World Scientific},
	author = {Su, Yanfang and Kress, Daniel H and Hong Wang}
}
@article {zhou_effects_2020,
	title = {The Effects on Inappropriate Weight for Gestational Age of an SMS Based Educational Intervention for Pregnant Women in Xi{\textquoteright}an China: A Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trial},
	journal = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health},
	volume = {17},
	number = {5},
	year = {2020},
	note = {Number: 5 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute},
	pages = {1482},
	abstract = {Background: The aim of this study was to estimate the effects of maternal text messages on inappropriate weight for gestational age (IWGA) in newborns in rural China. Methods: Participants were pregnant women presenting for antenatal care at a Maternal and Child Health Center in Xi{\textquoteright}an, China during the 2013{\textendash}2015 period. In total, 2115 women completed the program with follow-up information included in the final analyses. All mothers were divided into four groups, including (1) a control group that received only a few {\textquotedblleft}Basic{\textquotedblright} messages, (2) a Care-Seeking (CS) message group, (3) Good Household Prenatal Practices (GHPP) message group, and (4) a group receiving all 148 text messages. The primary outcome was IWGA, including small for gestational age (SGA) and macrosomia (weighing >=4000g at birth). Multivariable logistic regression using an intent-to-treat estimate was utilized. Results: In total, 19.5\% of newborns were IWGA. The risk of IWGA was 23.0\% in the control group, 19.6\% in the CS group, 18.9\% in the GHPP group, and 16.5\% in the group with All Texts. Compared to the control group, the odds ratio of IWGA was 0.65 (0.48{\textendash}0.89) for the group receiving All Texts, which remained statistically significant after performing the Holm-Bonferroni correction. The odds ratio of macrosomia was 0.54 (0.34{\textendash}0.87) and 0.57 (0.36{\textendash}0.49) for the Care Seeking message group and the All Texts group, respectively, with statistical significance. Conclusion: A package of free informational text messages, including advice for good household prenatal practices and care seeking, may prevent the inappropriate weight for gestational age through a protective effect on macrosomia. Advice to encourage care seeking in pregnancy may prevent macrosomia among neonates in rural China as well.},
	keywords = {inappropriate weight for gestational age, mhealth, quasi-randomized controlled trial, short message service},
	doi = {10.3390/ijerph17051482},
	url = {https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/5/1482},
	author = {Zhou, Zhongliang and Su, Yanfang and Heitner, Jesse and Si, Yafei and Wang, Dan and Zhiying Zhou and Yuan, Changzheng}
}
@article {micah_health_2020,
	title = {Health sector spending and spending on HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria, and development assistance for health: progress towards Sustainable Development Goal 3},
	journal = {The Lancet},
	year = {2020},
	note = {Publisher: Elsevier},
	month = {apr},
	abstract = {\textlessh2\textgreaterSummary\textless/h2\textgreater\textlessh3\textgreaterBackground\textless/h3\textgreater\textlessp\textgreaterSustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3 aims to "ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages". While a substantial effort has been made to quantify progress towards SDG3, less research has focused on tracking spending towards this goal. We used spending estimates to measure progress in financing the priority areas of SDG3, examine the association between outcomes and financing, and identify where resource gains are most needed to achieve the SDG3 indicators for which data are available.\textless/p\textgreater\textlessh3\textgreaterMethods\textless/h3\textgreater\textlessp\textgreaterWe estimated domestic health spending, disaggregated by source (government, out-of-pocket, and prepaid private) from 1995 to 2017 for 195 countries and territories. For disease-specific health spending, we estimated spending for HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis for 135 low-income and middle-income countries, and malaria in 106 malaria-endemic countries, from 2000 to 2017. We also estimated development assistance for health (DAH) from 1990 to 2019, by source, disbursing development agency, recipient, and health focus area, including DAH for pandemic preparedness. Finally, we estimated future health spending for 195 countries and territories from 2018 until 2030. We report all spending estimates in inflation-adjusted 2019 US\$, unless otherwise stated.\textless/p\textgreater\textlessh3\textgreaterFindings\textless/h3\textgreater\textlessp\textgreaterSince the development and implementation of the SDGs in 2015, global health spending has increased, reaching \$7{\textperiodcentered}9 trillion (95\% uncertainty interval 7{\textperiodcentered}8{\textendash}8{\textperiodcentered}0) in 2017 and is expected to increase to \$11{\textperiodcentered}0 trillion (10{\textperiodcentered}7{\textendash}11{\textperiodcentered}2) by 2030. In 2017, in low-income and middle-income countries spending on HIV/AIDS was \$20{\textperiodcentered}2 billion (17{\textperiodcentered}0{\textendash}25{\textperiodcentered}0) and on tuberculosis it was \$10{\textperiodcentered}9 billion (10{\textperiodcentered}3{\textendash}11{\textperiodcentered}8), and in malaria-endemic countries spending on malaria was \$5{\textperiodcentered}1 billion (4{\textperiodcentered}9{\textendash}5{\textperiodcentered}4). Development assistance for health was \$40{\textperiodcentered}6 billion in 2019 and HIV/AIDS has been the health focus area to receive the highest contribution since 2004. In 2019, \$374 million of DAH was provided for pandemic preparedness, less than 1\% of DAH. Although spending has increased across HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria since 2015, spending has not increased in all countries, and outcomes in terms of prevalence, incidence, and per-capita spending have been mixed. The proportion of health spending from pooled sources is expected to increase from 81{\textperiodcentered}6\% (81{\textperiodcentered}6{\textendash}81{\textperiodcentered}7) in 2015 to 83{\textperiodcentered}1\% (82{\textperiodcentered}8{\textendash}83{\textperiodcentered}3) in 2030.\textless/p\textgreater\textlessh3\textgreaterInterpretation\textless/h3\textgreater\textlessp\textgreaterHealth spending on SDG3 priority areas has increased, but not in all countries, and progress towards meeting the SDG3 targets has been mixed and has varied by country and by target. The evidence on the scale-up of spending and improvements in health outcomes suggest a nuanced relationship, such that increases in spending do not always results in improvements in outcomes. Although countries will probably need more resources to achieve SDG3, other constraints in the broader health system such as inefficient allocation of resources across interventions and populations, weak governance systems, human resource shortages, and drug shortages, will also need to be addressed.\textless/p\textgreater\textlessh3\textgreaterFunding\textless/h3\textgreater\textlessp\textgreaterThe Bill \&amp; Melinda Gates Foundation.\textless/p\textgreater},
	issn = {0140-6736, 1474-547X},
	doi = {10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30608-5},
	url = {https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30608-5/abstract},
	author = {Micah, Angela E. and Su, Yanfang and Bachmeier, Steven D. and Chapin, Abigail and Cogswell, Ian E. and Crosby, Sawyer W. and Cunningham, Brandon and Harle, Anton C. and Maddison, Emilie R. and Moitra, Modhurima and Sahu, Maitreyi and Schneider, Matthew T. and Simpson, Kyle E. and Stutzman, Hayley N. and Tsakalos, Golsum and Zende, Rahul R. and Zlavog, Bianca S. and Abbafati, Cristiana and Abebo, Zeleke Hailemariam and Abolhassani, Hassan and Abrigo, Michael R. M. and Ahmed, Muktar Beshir and Rufus Olusola Akinyemi and Alam, Khurshid and Ali, Saqib and Alinia, Cyrus and Alipour, Vahid and Syed Mohamed Aljunid and Almasi, Ali and Alvis-Guzman, Nelson and Ancuceanu, Robert and Andrei, Tudorel and Andrei, Catalina Liliana and Mina Anjomshoa and Antonio, Carl Abelardo T. and Arabloo, Jalal and Arab-Zozani, Morteza and Olatunde Aremu and Atnafu, Desta Debalkie and Marcel Ausloos and Avila-Burgos, Leticia and Ayanore, Martin Amogre and Azari, Samad and Babalola, Tesleem Kayode and Bagherzadeh, Mojtaba and Baig, Atif Amin and Bakhtiari, Ahad and Maciej Banach and Banerjee, Srikanta K. and Till Winfried B{\"a}rnighausen and Basu, Sanjay and Baune, Bernhard T. and Bayati, Mohsen and Berman, Adam E. and Bhageerathy, Reshmi and Bhardwaj, Pankaj and Bohluli, Mehdi and Reinhard Busse and Cahuana-Hurtado, Lucero and C{\'a}mera, Luis LA Alberto and Casta{\~n}eda-Orjuela, Carlos A. and Catal{\'a}-L{\'o}pez, Ferr{\'a}n and Cevik, Muge and Chattu, Vijay Kumar and Lalit Dandona and Dandona, Rakhi and Dianatinasab, Mostafa and Do, Hoa Thi and Doshmangir, Leila and Tantawi, Maha El and Eskandarieh, Sharareh and Esmaeilzadeh, Firooz and Faraj, Anwar and Farzadfar, Farshad and Fischer, Florian and Foigt, Nataliya A. and Fullman, Nancy and Gad, Mohamed M. and Ghafourifard, Mansour and Ghashghaee, Ahmad and Gholamian, Asadollah and Goharinezhad, Salime and Ayman Grada and Bidgoli, Hassan Haghparast and Hamidi, Samer and Harb, Hilda L. and Hasanpoor, Edris and Hay, Simon I. and Delia Hendrie and Henry, Nathaniel J. and Herteliu, Claudiu and Hole, Michael K. and Mehdi Hosseinzadeh and Hostiuc, Sorin and Huda, Tanvir M. and Humayun, Ayesha and Hwang, Bing-Fang and Olayinka Stephen Ilesanmi and Usman Iqbal and Irvani, Seyed Sina N. and Islam, Sheikh Mohammed Shariful and Islam, M. Mofizul and Jahani, Mohammad Ali and Mihajlo Jakovljevic and James, Spencer L. and Javaheri, Zohre and Jonas, Jost B. and Joukar, Farahnaz and Jacek Jerzy Jozwiak and J{\"u}risson, Mikk and Kalhor, Rohollah and Behzad Karami Matin and Karimi, Salah Eddin and Kayode, Gbenga A. and Ali Kazemi Karyani and Kinfu, Yohannes and Adnan Kisa and Stefan Kohler and Komaki, Hamidreza and Kosen, Soewarta and Kotlo, Anirudh and Koyanagi, Ai and Kumar, G. Anil and Kusuma, Dian and Lansingh, Van C. and Larsson, Anders O. and Lasrado, Savita and Lee, Shaun Wen Huey and Lee-Ling Lim and Rafael Lozano and Hassan Magdy Abd El Razek and Mahdavi, Mokhtar Mahdavi and Maleki, Shokofeh and Malekzadeh, Reza and Mansour-Ghanaei, Fariborz and Mohammad Ali Mansournia and Mantovani, Lorenzo Giovanni and Gabriel Martinez and Masoumi, Seyedeh Zahra and Benjamin Ballard Massenburg and Menezes, Ritesh G. and Mengesha, Endalkachew Worku and Meretoja, Tuomo J. and Meretoja, Atte and Tomislav Mestrovic and Kostova, Neda Milevska and Miller, Ted R. and Andreea Mirica and Mirrakhimov, Erkin M. and Moghadaszadeh, Masoud and Mohajer, Bahram and Mohamadi, Efat and Darwesh, Aso Mohammad and Mohammadian-Hafshejani, Abdollah and Mohammadpourhodki, Reza and Mohammed, Shafiu and Mohebi, Farnam and Mokdad, Ali H. and Shane Douglas Morrison and Mosser, Jonathan F. and Seyyed Meysam Mousavi and Muriithi, Moses K. and Saravanan Muthupandian and Myint, Chaw-Yin and Naderi, Mehdi and Nagarajan, Ahamarshan Jayaraman and Nguyen, Cuong Tat and Nguyen, Huong Lan Thi and Nonvignon, Justice and Jean Jacques Noubiap and Oh, In-Hwan and Olagunju, Andrew T. and Olusanya, Jacob Olusegun and Olusanya, Bolajoko Olubukunola and Bali, Ahmed Omar and Onwujekwe, Obinna E. and Otstavnov, Stanislav S. and Otstavnov, Nikita and Mayowa Ojo Owolabi and Padubidri, Jagadish Rao and Palladino, Raffaele and Panda-Jonas, Songhomitra and Pandey, Anamika and Postma, Maarten J. and Prada, Sergio I. and Pribadi, Dimas Ria Angga and Rabiee, Mohammad and Rabiee, Navid and Fakher Rahim and Ranabhat, Chhabi Lal and Rao, Sowmya J. and Rathi, Priya and Rawaf, Salman and David Laith Rawaf and Rawal, Lal and Rawassizadeh, Reza and Rezapour, Aziz and Sabour, Siamak and Sahraian, Mohammad Ali and Salman, Omar Mukhtar and Joshua A. Salomon and Samy, Abdallah M. and Juan Sanabria and Jo{\~a}o Vasco Santos and Milicevic, Milena M. Santric and Bruno Piassi Sao Jose and Savic, Miloje and Schwendicke, Falk and Senthilkumaran, Subramanian and Sepanlou, Sadaf G. and Edson Serv{\'a}n-Mori and Setayesh, Hamidreza and Shaikh, Masood Ali and Sheikh, Aziz and Kenji Shibuya and Shrime, Mark G. and Simonetti, Biagio and Singh, Jasvinder A. and Singh, Pushpendra and Skryabin, Valentin Yurievich and Soheili, Amin and Soltani, Shahin and Stefan, Simona C{\u a}t{\u a}lina and Tabar{\'e}s-Seisdedos, Rafael and Topor-Madry, Roman and Marcos Roberto Tovani-Palone and Tran, Bach Xuan and Travillian, Ravensara and Undurraga, Eduardo A. and Valdez, Pascual R. and Boven, Job F. M. van and Tommi Juhani Vasankari and Violante, Francesco S. and Vasily Vlassov and Vos, Theo and Wolfe, Charles D. A. and Wu, Junjie and Yaya, Sanni and Yazdi-Feyzabadi, Vahid and Yip, Paul and Yonemoto, Naohiro and Younis, Mustafa Z. and Chuanhua Yu and Zaidi, Zoubida and Sojib Bin Zaman and Zastrozhin, Mikhail Sergeevich and Zhang, Zhi-Jiang and Zhao, Yingxi and Christopher J.L. Murray and Dieleman, Joseph L.}
}
@article {su_tracking_2020,
	title = {Tracking total spending on tuberculosis by source and function in 135 low-income and middle-income countries, 2000{\textendash}17: a financial modelling study},
	journal = {The Lancet Infectious Diseases},
	year = {2020},
	note = {Publisher: Elsevier},
	abstract = {\textlessh2\textgreaterSummary\textless/h2\textgreater\textlessh3\textgreaterBackground\textless/h3\textgreater\textlessp\textgreaterEstimates of government spending and development assistance for tuberculosis exist, but less is known about out-of-pocket and prepaid private spending. We aimed to provide comprehensive estimates of total spending on tuberculosis in low-income and middle-income countries for 2000{\textendash}17.\textless/p\textgreater\textlessh3\textgreaterMethods\textless/h3\textgreater\textlessp\textgreaterWe extracted data on tuberculosis spending, unit costs, and health-care use from the WHO global tuberculosis database, Global Fund proposals and reports, National Health Accounts, the WHO-Choosing Interventions that are Cost-Effective project database, and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Development Assistance for Health Database. We extracted data from at least one of these sources for all 135 low-income and middle-income countries using the World Bank 2019 definitions. We estimated tuberculosis spending by source and function for notified (officially reported) and non-notified tuberculosis cases separately and combined, using spatiotemporal Gaussian process regression to fill in for missing data and estimate uncertainty. We aggregated estimates of government, out-of-pocket, prepaid private, and development assistance spending on tuberculosis to estimate total spending in 2019 US\$.\textless/p\textgreater\textlessh3\textgreaterFindings\textless/h3\textgreater\textlessp\textgreaterTotal spending on tuberculosis in 135 low-income and middle-income countries increased annually by 3{\textperiodcentered}9\% (95\% CI 3{\textperiodcentered}0 to 4{\textperiodcentered}6), from \$5{\textperiodcentered}7 billion (5{\textperiodcentered}2 to 6{\textperiodcentered}5) in 2000 to \$10{\textperiodcentered}9 billion (10{\textperiodcentered}3 to 11{\textperiodcentered}8) in 2017. Government spending increased annually by 5{\textperiodcentered}1\% (4{\textperiodcentered}4 to 5{\textperiodcentered}7) between 2000 and 2017, and reached \$6{\textperiodcentered}9 billion (6{\textperiodcentered}5 to 7{\textperiodcentered}5) or 63{\textperiodcentered}5\% (59{\textperiodcentered}2 to 66{\textperiodcentered}8) of all tuberculosis spending in 2017. Of government spending, \$5{\textperiodcentered}8 billion (5{\textperiodcentered}6 to 6{\textperiodcentered}1) was spent on notified cases. Out-of-pocket spending decreased annually by 0{\textperiodcentered}8\% (-2{\textperiodcentered}9 to 1{\textperiodcentered}3), from \$2{\textperiodcentered}4 billion (1{\textperiodcentered}9 to 3{\textperiodcentered}1) in 2000 to \$2{\textperiodcentered}1 billion (1{\textperiodcentered}6 to 2{\textperiodcentered}7) in 2017. Development assistance for country-specific spending on tuberculosis increased from \$54{\textperiodcentered}6 million in 2000 to \$1{\textperiodcentered}1 billion in 2017. Administrative costs and development assistance for global projects related to tuberculosis care increased from \$85{\textperiodcentered}3 million in 2000 to \$576{\textperiodcentered}2 million in 2017. 30 high tuberculosis burden countries of low and middle income accounted for 73{\textperiodcentered}7\% (71{\textperiodcentered}8{\textendash}75{\textperiodcentered}8) of tuberculosis spending in 2017.\textless/p\textgreater\textlessh3\textgreaterInterpretation\textless/h3\textgreater\textlessp\textgreaterDespite substantial increases since 2000, funding for tuberculosis is still far short of global financing targets and out-of-pocket spending remains high in resource-constrained countries, posing a barrier to patient{\textquoteright}s access to care and treatment adherence. Of the 30 countries with a high-burden of tuberculosis, just over half were primarily funded by government, while others, especially lower-middle-income and low-income countries, were still primarily dependent on development assistance for tuberculosis or out-of-pocket health spending.\textless/p\textgreater\textlessh3\textgreaterFunding\textless/h3\textgreater\textlessp\textgreaterBill \&amp; Melinda Gates Foundation.\textless/p\textgreater},
	issn = {1473-3099, 1474-4457},
	doi = {10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30124-9},
	url = {https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(20)30124-9/abstract},
	author = {Su, Yanfang and Baena, Ines Garcia and Harle, Anton C. and Crosby, Sawyer W. and Micah, Angela E. and Siroka, Andrew and Sahu, Maitreyi and Tsakalos, Golsum and Christopher J.L. Murray and Floyd, Katherine and Dieleman, Joseph L.}
}
@article {513691,
	title = {Improving Vignette Descriptions and Question Formats to Measure Distance Vision: Evidence from Cognitive Interviews among Students in China},
	journal = {Field MethodsField Methods},
	year = {2017},
	pages = {1525822X16680810},
	isbn = {1525-822X},
	author = {Su, Yanfang and Willis, Gordon and Joshua A. Salomon}
}
@article {464796,
	title = {Assessment of Primary Health Care System Performance in Nigeria: Using the Primary Health Care Performance Indicator Conceptual Framework},
	journal = {Health Systems \& Reform},
	number = {just-accepted},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {00-00},
	publisher = {Taylor \& Francis},
	isbn = {2328-8604},
	author = {Kress, Daniel and Su, Yanfang and Hong Wang}
}
@article {448396,
	title = {Impact of an SMS advice programme on maternal and newborn health in rural China: study protocol for a quasi-randomised controlled trial},
	journal = {BMJ open},
	volume = {6},
	number = {8},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {e011016},
	publisher = {British Medical Journal Publishing Group},
	isbn = {2044-6055},
	author = {Su, Yanfang and Yuan, Changzheng and Zhou, Zhongliang and Heitner, Jesse and Campbell, Benjamin}
}
@article {380386,
	title = {Unpaid Work, Gender Inequality, and the Origin of Family: Responding to Melinda Gates{\textquoteright} Annual Letter},
	journal = {NIWO self-help mothers{\textquoteright} group},
	year = {2016},
	month = {Feb 29 2016},
	type = {Commentary},
	author = {Su, Yanfang}
}
@mastersthesis {260931,
	title = {Improving Health Measures: Evidence from a List Experiment, Cognitive Interviews, and a Vignette Study},
	volume = {Doctor of Science},
	year = {2015},
	school = {Harvard University},
	address = {Boston},
	author = {Su, Yanfang and William Hsiao}
}
@conference {253436,
	title = {Direct Questioning or List-based Questioning: Evidence from a Survey Experiment on Intravenous Infusion Use and Smoking in China},
	booktitle = {12th Midwest International Economic Development Conference},
	year = {2015},
	address = {Madison, Wisconsin },
	author = {Su, Yanfang}
}
@article {253466,
	title = {The Financial Impact of the {\textquoteleft}Zero-Markup Policy for Essential Drugs{\textquoteright} on Patients in County Hospitals in Western Rural China},
	journal = {PLoS OnePLoS One},
	volume = {10},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {e0121630},
	author = {Zhou, Zhongliang and Su, Yanfang and Campbell, Benjamin and Zhiying Zhou and Gao, Jianmin and Qiang Yu and Jiuhao Chen and Yishan Pan}
}
@article {234896,
	title = {The impact of China{\textquoteright}s Zero-Markup Drug Policy on county hospital revenue and government subsidy levels},
	journal = {Journal of Asian Public PolicyJournal of Asian Public Policy},
	year = {2015},
	author = {Zhou, Zhongliang and Su, Yanfang and Campbell, Benjamin and Zhiying Zhou and ianmin Gao and Qiang Yu and Jiuhao Chen and Yishan Pan}
}
@article {234726,
	title = {Assessing equity of healthcare utilization in rural China: results from nationally representative surveys from 1993 to 2008},
	journal = {Int J Equity Health},
	volume = {12},
	year = {2013},
	pages = {34},
	author = {Zhou, Zhongliang and Su, Yanfang and Gao, Jianmin and Campbell, Benjamin and Zhu, Zhengwei and Xu, Ling and Zhang, Yaoguang}
}
@article {234746,
	title = {基本药物 {\textquotedblleft}零差率{\textquotedblright} 政策对住院费用的影响{\textemdash}{\textemdash}基于陕西省县级公立医院的研究},
	journal = {中国卫生政策研究},
	volume = {6},
	number = {12},
	year = {2013},
	pages = {25-32},
	author = {周忠良 and 苏延芳 and 周志英 and 高建民 and 禹强 and 陈玖浩 and 潘益山}
}
@article {234821,
	title = {An Inverted Pyramid: Three-tier Public Financing for Health in Nigeria},
	journal = {Harvard College Global Health ReviewHarvard College Global Health Review},
	volume = {IV},
	year = {2012},
	author = {Su, Yanfang}
}
@article {234771,
	title = {农村居民卫生服务需求弹性研究},
	journal = {中国卫生经济},
	volume = {30},
	number = {12},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {14-16},
	author = {周忠良 and 苏延芳 and 高建民 and 周志英 and 徐玲 and 张耀光}
}
@article {234731,
	title = {New estimates of elasticity of demand for healthcare in rural China},
	journal = {Health Policy},
	volume = {103},
	number = {2},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {255-265},
	publisher = {Elsevier},
	isbn = {0168-8510},
	author = {Zhou, Zhongliang and Su, Yanfang and Gao, Jianmin and Xu, Ling and Zhang, Yaoguang}
}
@webarticle {7294,
	title = {January Experience at the Gates Foundation},
	journal = {HSPH},
	year = {2011},
	month = {2/8/2011},
	url = {http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/administrative-offices/student-affairs/international-student-resources/},
	author = {Y. Su}
}
@proceedings {234736,
	title = {APPLICATION OF IMPOSSIBILITY THEOREM: PARETO VERSUS LIBERTY PRINCIPLES IN CONDITIONAL FOREIGN AID},
	journal = {INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE},
	volume = {17},
	year = {2010},
	pages = {280-280},
	publisher = {SPRINGER 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, NY 10013 USA},
	isbn = {1070-5503},
	author = {Su, Yanfang}
}
@newspaperarticle {234826,
	title = {Comparison of education systems in China and the US},
	journal = {People{\textquoteright}s Daily Overseas Edition},
	year = {2009},
	month = {Oct 23},
	author = {Su, Yanfang}
}
@article {234776,
	title = {亚洲医疗旅游产业探悉及其对中国的启示},
	journal = {中国医院},
	number = {1},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {74-77},
	author = {刘庭芳 and 苏延芳 and 苏承馥}
}
@mastersthesis {235016,
	title = {Application of Looting Models: State-owned Enterprise Bankruptcy by Policy or by Law},
	volume = {MA},
	year = {2007},
	school = {Tsinghua University},
	address = {Beijing },
	abstract = {There are two approaches to bankrupt State-owned Enterprise (SOE): bankruptcy by policy or by law. This research deals with theoretical questions and practical problems in SOE bankruptcy, especially the relationship among bankruptcy policy, bankruptcy law and strategic bankruptcy.
Theoretically, Hoff-Stiglitz Model and Akerlof-Romer Model are extended. It is indicated that implementation of bankruptcy policy increases the possibility in strategetic bankruptcy: First, the equilibrium of law supply, looting capacity and law demand is explained in macro perspective; Second, rational decision of strategic bankruptcy is testified in micro perspective. This research reveals that dilemma of bankruptcy policy is inevitable: on one hand, SOE with heavy historical burden would face serious problems such as social movement in bankruptcy without subsidy; on the other hand, SOE and local government could get undeserved subsidy even loot the enterprise with bankruptcy policy. The analysis of micro decision making mechanism demonstrates that the controller of SOE concerns with residual income instead of the maximum of enterprise value. While maximizing residual income is implemented in strategetic bankruptcy, looting and minus externality would occur.
Strategic bankruptcy cases in Chengtong Group emperically corroborate former theoretical analyses in two aspects: the change of power and of capital flow in strategic bankruptcy as well as the relationship of government, controller, worker and creditor as stake-holders. Those cases also imply that who gets what and how in the process of strategic bankruptcy and that the effect of bankruptcy policy is different from the purpose.
Extended Hoff-Stiglitz Model showes strategic bankruptcy reduces the demand of bankruptcy law. According to termination of bankruptcy policy in 2008 and the process of bankruptcy law legislation, the further research in need and regulation in preventing SOE from being looted are presented.
\&nbsp;
\&nbsp;
Keywords: Bankruptcy Policy\&nbsp;\&nbsp;\&nbsp; Strategetic Bankruptcy\&nbsp;\&nbsp;\&nbsp; Looting Akerlof-Romer Model 
Hoff -Stiglitz Mode
 },
	author = {Su, Yanfang and Zhiyuan Cui}
}
@mastersthesis {234901,
	title = {掠夺模型的应用：国有企业政策性破产和依法破产},
	volume = {公共管理硕士},
	year = {2007},
	school = {清华大学},
	address = {北京},
	abstract = { 
中国国有企业破产有两种方式：政策性破产和依法破产。本研究以政治经济学范式认知国有企业破产中涉及的问题，主要应用两个掠夺模型分析政策性破产、依法破产和策略性破产之间的相互关系。
 
本研究在理论层面上，运用拓展Hoff -Stiglitz模型从宏观角度分析了掠夺能力强化机制，其后从中国国有企业特征出发，拓展运用了Akerlof-Romer模型从微观角度分析了策略性破产的理性决策过程，说明在中国国有企业政策性破产的实施增加策略性破产的可能性。研究结果显示，政策性破产的行政主导特征使得救济功能和引致掠夺功能共存，从而难以避免政策性破产的两难困境：没有政策性破产，背负沉重历史包袱的国有企业将在破产中面临大量职工安置问题，引发群体性事件甚至是社会动荡；有了政策性破产，企业领导层和地方政府将有可能策略性地得到不该有的补贴和救济，甚至去掠夺企业。微观机制的分析更清晰地表明，企业控制者关心的是掠夺收入和经营收入的比较而不仅仅是企业价值最大化,而且当最大化剩余收入以策略性破产的形式实现时会产生掠夺以及负外部性。
 
在实证层面，中国诚通集团破产案例印证了上述的理论分析，揭示策略性破产企业的权力流动和资本流动以及政府方、经理人、职工、债权人关系，揭示企业控制者如何策略性致使企业亏损，通过破产实现剩余索取权最大化，同时显示政策性破产政策的政策结果与政策意图的背离。
 
以上从理论和实证两个方面指出政治环境对经济行为的影响，同时需要指出的是经济行为对政治环境的影响。拓展的Hoff-Stiglitz模型分析进一步表明掠夺行为降低了法治需求，《破产法》立法进程之缓慢与策略性破产存在相关性，策略性破产以及其他掠夺行为降低了对《破产法》的需求。
 
最后，针对2008年政策性破产的终止和《破产法》的立法，提出需要进一步研究的问题和掠夺规避方式。
 
\&nbsp;
 
关键词：政策性破产\&nbsp;\&nbsp;\&nbsp; 策略性破产\&nbsp;\&nbsp; 掠夺\&nbsp;\&nbsp; Akerlof-Romer模型\&nbsp;\&nbsp; Hoff -Stiglitz模型
 
  },
	author = {苏延芳 and 崔之元}
}
@article {234751,
	title = {反事实研究: 放松规制与中国航空网络的演变},
	journal = {财经研究},
	volume = {32},
	number = {3},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {103-113},
	author = {苏延芳 and 肖兴志}
}
@article {234781,
	title = {重叠共识: 全球视角的中国之路},
	journal = {中国社会科学院研究生院学报},
	number = {5},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {15-20},
	author = {苏延芳}
}
@article {6556,
	title = {Counterfactual Analysis: Deregulation and Changes of Aviation Network in China},
	journal = {The Study of Finance and Economics},
	volume = {3},
	year = {2006},
	month = {2006},
	pages = {103-13},
	abstract = {Abstract: The rule of aviation industry was discussed through analyzing the evolvement of US aviation network, and the tendency of China aviation industry was predicted. First, history of aviation deregulation in US was reviewed, then two theory models were introduced: one was a simple model about air lines prevalence ratio of in the aviation network, the other was about the cost comparison between the fully connected (FC) network and the hub-spoke (HS) network. In the further analysis, the applicability of FC network and HS network was illustrated by using a simulated sample to compare the network externality and the transportation cost between FC network and HS network, then the present situation of FC network and HS network in China was explored according to the market research of China regional aviation after that, counterfactual method is discussed. At last, relative policy suggestions are proposed.},
	author = {Y. Su and X. Xiao}
}
@article {234906,
	title = {The Difficulties of Chinese Peasants after China entered the WTO},
	journal = {Hong Kong Economic JournalHong Kong Economic Journal},
	year = {2005},
	pages = {14},
	author = {Su, Yanfang}
}
