@inbook {646359,
	title = {New protectionism and the U.S.-China trade war},
	booktitle = {Reconsidering Political Risk in an Era of New Political, Social, Economic \& Technological Realities},
	year = {Forthcoming},
	publisher = {University of Applied Sciences BFI},
	organization = {University of Applied Sciences BFI},
	address = {Vienna},
	author = {Zoltan Feher},
	editor = {Johannes Leitner and Hannes Meissner}
}
@broadcast {701346,
	title = {Analyzing Strategic Competition Between the U.S. and China},
	journal = {Applied Geopolitics Podcast},
	year = {2023},
	publisher = {RANE},
	url = {https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/applied-geopolitics-analyzing-strategic-competition-between-us-and-china},
	author = {Rodger Baker and Zoltan Feher}
}
@article {671191,
	title = {H-Diplo Teaching Roundtable on Games and Simulations in International Relations, invited contribution},
	journal = {H-Diplo},
	number = {Roundtable XXII-27},
	year = {2021},
	abstract = {Feher and Sobchak start their essay with the observation that {\textquotedblleft}the baseline expectation of how learning would occur{\textquotedblright} has changed since their own undergraduate experiences.\&nbsp; They argue that games and simulations can provide {\textquotedblleft}insight into real-world decision-making processes{\textquotedblright} and offer a more direct bridge between theory and practice than typical lectures.\&nbsp; Feher and Sobchak{\textquoteright}s discussion also highlights some {\textquotedblleft}key ingredients{\textquotedblright} to creating effective games and simulations.\&nbsp; In brief, they identify three key components to an effective simulation: students{\textquoteright} good-faith role-playing, the addition of insufficient information and time constraints that can stoke interpersonal conflict and debate, and the creation of {\textquotedblleft}an all-knowing control cell{\textquotedblright} (that is, a professor and/or teaching assistants) that can script the scenario and answer questions as they arise.\&nbsp; This essay is useful for its account of the authors{\textquoteright} experience in running multiple simulations: the Cuban Missile Crisis, the South China Sea crisis (a maritime crisis prompted by an accident that involved the U.S. navy and a Kenyan cargo carrying Chinese toxic waste), and a UN-sponsored climate change conference, a larger simulation ({\textquotedblleft}SIMULEX{\textquotedblright}) for the International Security Studies Program at the Fletcher School. Feher and Sobchak conclude that {\textquotedblleft}games and simulations [will] help prepare the next generation [of leaders] to do their best even in the worst circumstances.{\textquotedblright}},
	url = {https://networks.h-net.org/node/28443/discussions/7300833/h-diplo-roundtable-xxii-27-teaching-roundtable-games-and},
	author = {Zoltan Feher and Frank Sobchak},
	editor = {Andrew Szarejko}
}
@webarticle {661822,
	title = {The Rise and Fall of U.S. Engagement toward China},
	journal = {Elephants in the War Room Blog, Center for Strategic Studies},
	year = {2020},
	abstract = {In the post-Cold War era, U.S. engagement toward China was a na{\"\i}ve \&amp; misguided strategy. While it facilitated China{\textquoteright}s rise, it did not achieve U.S. goals (liberalization, China as "responsible stakeholder"). It{\textquoteright}s time for balancing.},
	url = {https://sites.tufts.edu/css/the-rise-and-fall-of-u-s-engagement-toward-china/},
	author = {Zoltan Feher}
}
@website {646360,
	title = {Transoceanic Control: Rethinking American Strategy},
	journal = {Elephants in the War Room Blog, Center for Strategic Studies},
	year = {2017},
	url = {https://sites.tufts.edu/css/research-policy-seminar-peter-dombrowski-on-transoceanic-control-rethinking-american-strategy/ },
	author = {Zoltan Feher}
}
@article {692368,
	title = {Neorealist Trump: A New Grand Strategy?},
	journal = {The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs},
	volume = {2017},
	number = {3},
	year = {2017},
	abstract = {In spite of all the protestations from mainstream experts and practitioners, Trump{\textquoteright}s foreign policy agenda{\textemdash}even though it may differ sharply from recent tradition{\textemdash}is not new, bizarre, or even entirely radical. Many of the same proposals have actually been around in the academic and policy worlds for several years and advocated by the so{\textemdash}called "Neorealists."},
	url = {http://www.fletcherforum.org/home/2017/3/4/neorealist-trump-a-new-grand-strategy?rq=zoltan},
	author = {Zoltan Feher}
}
@article {690645,
	title = {NATO{\textquoteright}s New Place in the European Security Architecture},
	journal = {Bard Journal of Social Sciences},
	volume = {IX},
	number = {I},
	year = {2001},
	pages = {47-63},
	author = {Zoltan Feher}
}
