Icelandic Fisheries Management: Fees vs. Quotas

Citation:

Weitzman ML, Gylfason T. Icelandic Fisheries Management: Fees vs. Quotas, in Conference on Small Island Economies. Cambridge, MA: Center for International Development, Harvard University ; 2002.

Date Presented:

May 20, 2002

Abstract:

We discuss the quota system by which Iceland’s fisheries have been managed since 1984, and explore its implications for economic efficiency as well as fairness. We argue that the shortcomings of the Icelandic quota system are inherent in any type of quota system applied to high-seas fishing. Further, we find that regulating access to a limited, stochastic common-property natural resource such as Iceland’s fish by fee rather than by quota – i.e., by relying on price incentives rather than quantitative restrictions – would constitute a more equitable and more efficient solution to the fisheries management problem. Our argument applies to the management of all openseas fisheries, including the Common Fisheries Policy of the European Union.

Presented at a conference on Small Island Economies at Harvard University, Center for International Development, 20 May 2002, and circulated as CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3849, March 2003. 

T. Gylfason's website

Last updated on 10/03/2017